Mail Archives: cygwin/1997/09/22/21:26:46
Valery Fine wrote:
>
> On 22 Sep 97 at 14:15, Sergey Okhapkin wrote:
>
> > Valery Fine wrote:
> > > On 22 Sep 97 at 8:33, Sergey Okhapkin wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > times() call works on NT only. The underlying syscall
> > > > GetProcessTimes() unimplemented on windows 95. The output of your
> > > > examle looks the following on my box (NT4.0 SP3):
> > >
> > > Probably like this would be better then just ZERO:
> > >
> >
> > I'm not sure. Probably, it's better to return -1 and to set errno to
> > ENOSYS, rather than return incorrect value.
>
> It would be as correct as the user's OS (namely Win95) provides
> Since calling that API user wants (I guess) to estimate the time
> ========
> and this incorrect value may help him but ENOSYS ?
>
> Anyway it can not be absolutely precise value for any system. There
> is some error anyway. This error will be large for Win95. For this
> case the
>
> "REAL exact value" <= "supplied"
>
> and it will be not far from the real one if the user's system is
> running a single process.
>
> Is it wrong ?
I would say yes, you are wrong. Sergey pointed out that the function
is not implemented on Win95. Returning any value other than error
would be a mistake in my opinion.
I agree with Sergey's response and -1 should be returned on Win95
until it's possible to actually implement the feature.
--
,-/- __ _ _ $Bill Luebkert
(_/ / ) // // DBE Collectibles
/ ) /--< o // // http://www.wgn.net/~dbe/
-/-' /___/_<_</_</_ Email: dbe AT wgn DOT net
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".
- Raw text -