www.delorie.com/gnu/docs/calc/calc_85.html | search |
Buy the book! | |
[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
The hard part is that V R + is no longer sufficient to add up all the contributions from the slices, since the slices have varying coefficients. So first we must come up with a vector of these coefficients. Here's one way:
2: -1 2: 3 1: [4, 2, ..., 4] 1: [1, 2, ..., 9] 1: [-1, 1, ..., -1] . . . 1 n v x 9 RET V M ^ 3 TAB - |
1: [4, 2, ..., 4, 1] 1: [1, 4, 2, ..., 4, 1] . . 1 | 1 TAB | |
Now we compute the function values. Note that for this method we need eleven values, including both endpoints of the desired interval.
2: [1, 4, 2, ..., 4, 1] 1: [1, 1.1, 1.2, ... , 1.8, 1.9, 2.] . 11 RET 1 RET .1 RET C-u v x |
2: [1, 4, 2, ..., 4, 1] 1: [0., 0.084941, 0.16993, ... ] . ' sin(x) ln(x) RET m r p 5 RET V M $ RET |
Once again this calls for V M * V R +; a simple * does the same thing.
1: 11.22 1: 1.122 1: 0.374 . . . * .1 * 3 / |
Wow! That's even better than the result from the Taylor series method.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2003 by The Free Software Foundation | Updated Jun 2003 |