Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 16:29:39 +0200
From: Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: How updated is PGCC CVS?
Message-ID: <20000910162939.G2000@cerebro.laendle>
Mail-Followup-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
References: <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 21 DOT 0009071105100 DOT 11019-100000 AT ania> <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 21 DOT 0009071928290 DOT 17157-100000 AT mangueira DOT if DOT uff DOT br>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0009071928290.17157-100000@mangueira.if.uff.br>; from tjpp@if.uff.br on Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 07:30:47PM -0300
X-Operating-System: Linux version 2.2.16 (root AT cerebro) (gcc driver version pgcc-2.95.2 19991024 (release) executing gcc version 2.7.2.3) 
X-Copyright: copyright 2000 Marc Alexander Lehmann - all rights reserved
Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 07:30:47PM -0300, Thadeu Penna <tjpp AT if DOT uff DOT br> wrote:
> cvs. It is built and runs nicely. However, I could not find any file newer
> than 1999? Is it correct ? Is there a changelog ?

No, there is not a changelog, and indeed no file in the main branch has
been updated since that time (it's only a mirror). I do want to mirror it
regularly, but I am happy enough when I can follow gcc development at this
time (I am pretty busy, and my only concern at the moment is keeping pgcc
running, while adding new features to both gcc and pgcc).

-- 
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT opengroup DOT org |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |