Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 08:49:41 +0200
From: Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Athlon
Message-ID: <20000602084941.C491@cerebro.laendle>
Mail-Followup-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
References: <4120005331224527640 AT hehe DOT com> <20000601105140 DOT B5439 AT cerebro DOT laendle> <3936E94C DOT 6D03E0E2 AT cent DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <3936E94C.6D03E0E2@cent.com>; from proton@cent.com on Thu, Jun 01, 2000 at 06:53:00PM -0400
X-Operating-System: Linux version 2.2.15 (root AT cerebro) (gcc version 2.95.1 19990816 (release)) 
Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jun 01, 2000 at 06:53:00PM -0400, "Mark K. Patterson" <proton AT cent DOT com> wrote:
> Is there an (approximate) release date for the next gcc & pgcc?

Not that I know of. GCC lacked a release manager for some time (not too many
people want loads of additional work ;), which changed only recently.

The new RM is still working out release conditions. It's best to watch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ for more info. The GCC team is determined to make a
2.97 release quickly before the final big step to gcc-3.0.

-- 
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT opengroup DOT org |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |