Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 11:36:14 +0200 From: Jan Hubicka To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com Cc: dstrozzi AT mit DOT edu Subject: Re: Athlons Message-ID: <20000426113614.B13938@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> References: <38FEB352 DOT DF08CD5 AT mit DOT edu> <000201bfaebf$6b79e380$bb08a5c3 AT oemcomputer> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <000201bfaebf$6b79e380$bb08a5c3@oemcomputer>; from turo.lamminen@pp.inet.fi on Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 04:16:39PM +0300 Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: pgcc AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: root > To: > Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2000 10:35 AM > Subject: Athlons > > > > I was wondering what settings are best for the amd athlon chip, in > > particular -march=??? It would be great it this could be addressed in > > section 4 of the FAQ. > > > > Thanks a lot. > > Try http://aboutlinux.com/art_k7opt1_a.html I should also mention, that I've added -march=athlon optimization switch to the latest gcc snapshots. I believe these are quite well tuned and provide ought to be superrior to the thinks noted in the document. Honza > > -- > Hi, I'm a signature virus. plz set me as your signature and help me spread > :)