Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 14:37:17 +0100 From: Marc Lehmann To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: pgcc-2.95.2 illegal instruction Message-ID: <20000127143717.F2602@cerebro.laendle> Mail-Followup-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com References: <388EE3FB DOT D4B08E8D AT informatik DOT fh-wiesbaden DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <388EE3FB.D4B08E8D@informatik.fh-wiesbaden.de>; from Christoph.Weyer@informatik.fh-wiesbaden.de on Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 01:09:31PM +0100 X-Operating-System: Linux version 2.2.14 (root AT cerebro) (gcc version 2.95.1 19990816 (release)) Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: dj-admin AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: pgcc AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 01:09:31PM +0100, Christoph Weyer wrote: > > I'm curious, what instruction was it? (you can probably use gdb's > > disassemble command to see instructions surrounding the place where it > > failed.) The problem seems to be that the compiler was configured for a pentiumpro+ target, which means that it's runtime libraries might (and obviously do) contain pentiumpro instructions. The solution would be to configure for a i586 target. AFAICS this means that the nbinary distribution of the Pentium-GCC will not run on the pentium ;( This problem didn't show up earlier since earlier versions of gcc/pgcc weren'T very aggressive about using cmov.. -- -----==- | ----==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg AT opengroup DOT org |e| -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+ The choice of a GNU generation | |