Sender: jkf AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <37C243C2.85F5F6BF@casema.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 09:03:30 +0200
From: Martijn Kruithof <jkf AT casema DOT net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.5-15smp i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Are you alive?
References: <19990819223402 DOT C10953 AT cerebro DOT laendle> <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 10 DOT 9908201419470 DOT 1364-100000 AT altay DOT adm DOT deu DOT edu DOT tr> <19990823225952 DOT B365 AT cerebro DOT laendle>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com

Marc Lehmann wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 02:21:35PM +0300, Erhan Bilgili <erhan AT altay DOT adm DOT deu DOT edu DOT tr> wrote:
> > > If anybody else wants to make a nice patch from cvs (checked against the
> > > source tree), then this is the time to speak up !
> > >
> >       is 2.95.1 submitted to CVS ?
> 
> should be by now.
> 
> > if so i can prepare the packages - RPMS- today and put them to
> > ftp://ftp.deu.edu.tr/pub/linux/PentiumGCC
> 
> Fine for me, but what I really need is a diff file and somebody who checks
> and uploads it.
> 
> In any case, a RPMS is better than nothing, ut it limits the number of people
> being able to use it considerably ;(
> 

I ve been away a while and I am willing to make a diff file,
currently I am running a cvs update, I will make the diff against
the gcc 2.95.1 from 
ftp://go.cygnus.com/pub/sourceware.cygnus.com/pub/egcs/releases/index.html
for security reasons i will use the original package 
GCC 2.95.1, bzip2 format, 9.3Meg
and not do any diffing myself for this.
Where should i put the diff afterwards so that it can be checked
/ downloaded?
Probably i will leave the gcc documentation in, unless that's
a problem. (CVS pgcc does not seem to have documentation)


-- 
http://users.casema.net/~jkf
Linux distributies voor maar
Fl 10 per CD, inclusief verzendkosten!