Message-ID: <37BEBA27.6C0E53E0@lycosmail.com> Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 10:39:36 -0400 From: Adam Schrotenboer X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: pgcc References: <19990818114732 DOT 68246 DOT qmail AT hotmail DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id KAA22827 Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com file will report 80386 in almost any case. AFAIK All it checks is the header info and and such. Guilherme Fortunato wrote: > Hello > > How do I know the program compiled with pgcc is really optimized to the > platform I first intended it to be. I do not have another computer to test > the executable, file still reports 80386 and I did not noticed much > improvement in terms of speed. Also, running some tests (opengl > applications) I noticed that the gcc program that comes with pgcc package > most of the time produces faster code than pgcc, using the same source and > compiler options (it also produces much bigger executables, sometimes twice > as big, and it is not just debugging information). I have pgcc version 2.91 > (download in rpm format) and I am not in the mailing list. IŽd really > appreciate an answer. Thank you! > > Guilherme Fortunato > guilherme18 AT hotmail DOT com > > ______________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com