Sender: jur AT rz DOT hu-berlin DOT de
Message-ID: <373C392E.E8AD5375@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 14:54:38 +0000
From: Jens-Uwe Rumstich <rumstich AT informatik DOT hu-berlin DOT de>
Organization: TUSCON
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.5 i586)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: What types of optimizations are present for the K6?
References: <37374C32 DOT 4D12565A AT home DOT com> <19990511001039 DOT K22062 AT cerebro DOT laendle> <3737B56C DOT 58A8D860 AT home DOT com> <19990511193940 DOT E14657 AT cerebro DOT laendle>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com

Hi!

> > Don't take this as a slag, I could totally understand K6 support not being as
> > widespread or ferverously developed as standard Pentium support.  I'm really
> 
> Its simple: I've never touched a K6, thats one of the problems ;)

so who is the guy in charge for K6 optimizing?

>       ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--

cu
	Jens-Uwe