Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 22:33:54 -0500 (EST)
From: Nathan Farrington  <nfarring AT winnie DOT fit DOT edu>
To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: 
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990316211437.2929A-100000@recomnet.recomnet.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.96.990316223055.19927A-100000@winnie.fit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 16 Mar 1999, Dan Melomedman (free video eden) wrote:

> It has potential only if Intel will not come up with a next Pentium.
> Imagine Intel coming out with Pentium IV, with a new set of instructions,
> and not willing to license their technology to AMD.

I thought that the Pentium IV was the Merced...I don't think AMD will be
too interested in Intel's technology! :]

Nathan Farrington
nfarring AT fit DOT edu