Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 05:22:49 +0100 To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: Kernel Message-ID: <19990314052249.T21035@cerebro.laendle> Mail-Followup-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com References: <19990311215311 DOT G11562 AT cerebro DOT laendle> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: ; from David Ford on Sat, Mar 13, 1999 at 02:18:10PM -0800 X-Operating-System: Linux version 2.2.3 (root AT cerebro) (gcc driver version pgcc-2.93.09 19990221 (gcc2 ss-980929 experimental) executing gcc version 2.7.2.3) From: Marc Lehmann Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: pgcc AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sat, Mar 13, 1999 at 02:18:10PM -0800, David Ford wrote: > > Inofficially, I want the kernel to work with pgcc, of course, but until the > > current faq maintainer does hard work and sorts out all these issues in the > > faq I'll tell all people "don't do that!". > > imho, this is a clash of egos and does nothing to advance our collective > works. Your humble opinion is wrong. egcs always had an open ear to linus (and still has). it has nothing to do with ego on the side of egcs. the problem is that linus (having a very limited knowledge of compilers) thinks he knows how egcs has to work. If you'd follow linux-kernel you'd knew that he pissed off quite many of his co-workers as well. -- -----==- | ----==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg AT goof DOT com |e| -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+ The choice of a GNU generation | |