X-pop3-spooler: POP3MAIL 2.1.0 b 4 980420 -bs-
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 1998 00:59:27 +0200
From: Fox <fox AT cclinf30 DOT polito DOT it>
Subject: Re: bzip2-mx vs. bzip2-nomx
To: beastium <beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl>
Reply-to: fox AT cclinf30 DOT polito DOT it
Message-id: <98070101044400.00560@FoxServer.fox.net>
X-Envelope-to: beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: KMail [version 0.6.5]
Content-type: text/plain
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Sender: Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
Status: RO
X-Status: A
Content-Length: 518
Lines: 14

> K6-3D and K6-2 are much stronger in this area. They have a dual MMX core
> and will perform better on MMX.

>is anybody with such beasts here that can test them against the two bzips?

Hello
I have just subscribed to this mailing list so I don't exactly know what
the discussion is about but I am wondering if there is a pgcc option in
order to compile an mmx code (i use -mpentiumpro at the moment).
I have a K6 233 but not a k6 2 will it be the same ?? How can I compile
bzip2 for mmx ???

Bye
                Fox