X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new (Uni-Kiel/l2ms-sc)
From: geda AT psjt DOT org (Stephan =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=B6ttcher?=)
To: "Richard Rasker \(rasker\@linetec.nl\) \[via geda-user\@delorie.com\]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Another PCB grid step question
References: <c3aa1897-3806-3f72-feef-85551a63c2db AT linetec DOT nl>
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2018 11:19:58 +0100
In-Reply-To: <c3aa1897-3806-3f72-feef-85551a63c2db@linetec.nl> (Richard
	Rasker's message of "Fri, 9 Feb 2018 10:46:25 +0100")
Message-ID: <s6nk1vmtqgh.fsf@falbala.ieap.uni-kiel.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

"Richard Rasker (rasker AT linetec DOT nl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]"
<geda-user AT delorie DOT com> writes:

> Isn't it far more logical to adopt the logarithm-based step scheme
> that is ubiquitous wherever scaling takes place, so 1 - 2 - 5 - 10 -
> 20 - 50 etcetera?

I find it difficult to work with steps sizes that are not integer
multiples.  Doing some work a 2.5mil, when switching to 1mil I cannot
find half the endpoints.  Requires some discipline to skip some steps,
accoring to preferences. Either 1 - 5 - 10, or  1 - 2 - 10.

-- 
Stephan