X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] gshem 1.8.2 Bug? Slotting fails for a custom BPX85 photo-transistor array To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <7b205135-7b91-e8f0-a5d8-efc4cb0b787d AT zen DOT co DOT uk> From: "Barry Jackson (zen25000 AT zen DOT co DOT uk) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" Message-ID: Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 23:56:42 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from Quoted-Printable to 8bit by delorie.com id v8DMujER008618 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On 13/09/17 13:10, Roland Lutz wrote: > On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, Stephan Böttcher wrote: >> If you want to tell gschem where and how to draw the pin numbers next >> to the pins, you'll need the pinnumber= attributes. > > You're right, I didn't think about that. > > It still seems kind of wrong to include an attribute with a value which > will be ignored, just so it can be replaced with the actual attribute… Yes. I tested putting pinnumber=_ in the symbol rather than numbers, this allowed the '_'s to be positioned in the symbol as placeholders for the pin numbers and on placing the symbol in a schematic they were initially transformed into the pin numbers for slot 1. I quite like that as a workaround. :) Cheers, Barry