X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-UW-Orig-Sender: fpm AT homer11 DOT u DOT washington DOT edu Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 09:15:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Frank Miles (fpm AT u DOT washington DOT edu) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: "Rob Butts (r DOT butts2 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" Subject: Re: [geda-user] Recommend USB Logic Analyzer (sorry for off topic) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (LRH 1302 2010-07-20) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-PMX-Version: 6.3.3.2656215, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2017.6.2.160617, AntiVirus-Engine: 5.38.0, AntiVirus-Data: 2017.6.2.5380001 X-PMX-Server: mxout21.s.uw.edu X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=X, Probability=10%, Report=' TO_IN_SUBJECT 0.5, HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_400_499 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, DATE_TZ_NA 0, IN_REP_TO 0, LEGITIMATE_SIGNS 0, MSG_THREAD 0, NO_URI_HTTPS 0, REFERENCES 0, __ANY_URI 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __FORWARDED_MSG 0, __FRAUD_BODY_WEBMAIL 0, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_TEXT_P 0, __MIME_TEXT_P1 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __NO_HTML_TAG_RAW 0, __REFERENCES 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE 0, __TO_IN_SUBJECT 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __URI_NO_WWW 0, __URI_NS , __USER_AGENT 0' Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Fri, 2 Jun 2017, Rob Butts (r DOT butts2 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > I haven't decided yet on a usb logic analyzer. I would like to view the four outputs of a 12V H-bridge and from what I see the 12V > exceeds Diligent's maximum voltage per channel. > Am I correct in reading that? > ? Yes. Of course you can use the 10x attenuator probes to eliminate that problem.