X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 11:39:15 -0500 From: al davis To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [dev] proposal: new gschem -> pcb flow (was: Re: [geda-user] Recent gschem-PCB import problem?) Message-ID: <20170218113915.44687877@floyd.freeelectron.net> In-Reply-To: <65B2DAA3-13DE-43E1-A2AC-E761F07319E8@noqsi.com> References: <1487162236 DOT 3011 DOT 9 DOT camel AT linetec> <1487176819 DOT 3011 DOT 27 DOT camel AT linetec> <65B2DAA3-13DE-43E1-A2AC-E761F07319E8 AT noqsi DOT com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 08:04:59 -0700 John Doty wrote: > Then, there’s Al Davis’s similar proposal for gEDA. It’s > gnucap-centric rather than pcb-centric. I note you didn’t adopt that. It's not gnucap centric. It is based on a published standard that is widely used but not supported by geda.