X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] QFN packages solder mask To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <2df480cc-5ef2-9ac6-b7ad-d17788a6b8b9 AT ecosensory DOT com> From: "Dan McMahill (dan AT mcmahill DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" Message-ID: Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 23:00:39 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2df480cc-5ef2-9ac6-b7ad-d17788a6b8b9@ecosensory.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfDMUl4oAPuHymOhuQesXTX/ucgGQn8JmEs4iMj2OnClsVm63a3ybdewGqlJhgfVHCDsTn//AV+5aEQtGyfLpQwK4psTrGXKxaYesQDoxmw7YcT962Dgp Ju8o7zxcQTS0qGOketRrNu7ym/TA6+lWRJPH7RkulhcoEjP/DFTwamQD Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On 1/17/2017 4:47 PM, John Griessen (john AT ecosensory DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > I've been making footprints for QFN packages and came across guidelines > by the chip makers that say > it is beneficial to have some solder mask under the edge of the QFN > package, but not if it gets too thin > anywhere, as it can come off and cause trouble if it is. I don't have great suggestions about the soldermask bit. Did you look at the QFN footprints in the ~geda library? I thought we had a decent coverage of packages but it has been a while since I looked.