X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
         :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
        bh=vUbr/IWUAtxkV/C4z+aLXkfQE8eADp1mI2RjjoGOMkw=;
        b=aZ3gn+sfWd5c3wtcF/uBa2GD73bPRCtLLuXOCBN/z0xLcl190k/0aUSdEaEg9P/F02
         ylmWiyxhAFFMzCvvCFEBjDj+eQHKITtLdSVZofZS8QaJEI7Q81Ia8ypOtSV6vQNoF0fJ
         UfuO9o/hUOV1xncmzFJTvVcRk5fn+iCYzBUJn423m0d3SmiM46gisi5aBHL+hKB11oMc
         SJk15K502qLeaMnGneKgGynfUaP7Tu1rParURfNOBBwt0frMBVOAIU4ol0pzvREUTduE
         ccDK5Q4qstChhHk7yOcw0SmBEmRO4pfPK1e4AjoKlf/vxK8WfXJ4A9ZSmFSHKeQMShG4
         ofXQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to
         :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
        bh=vUbr/IWUAtxkV/C4z+aLXkfQE8eADp1mI2RjjoGOMkw=;
        b=a0vcKjTzQs3ZFUmRJLRdcV/cuvQlagCiw6GV7Wa+huehPh/sEd8S9i7TN4QMJIs2mX
         GTg8g6dMaSlvXQ4w87CJpAKzum+UH1iQftjVk1KqGMIav60VJNY/+zZYVrX8XR/FaQ55
         eph9bKXEq+ppBC1RZPLgbIJPWd8bfRyyn4vsTkiPKx4+xl4hsTrnzdDTxALw7mR17GA/
         +qBJ4FMjq59OiDpcLI2dT4why57nQfC3/UDwLs6gJSQnSXWkPFZjK9s8nDFLEGe7i4UT
         6lvQhf5BeXR0NthOD0iBSyqpp4Yx8E2hBE3C48IQuUiphFcYJUwkzWvhS0Gt7SeXQaqr
         GcHA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJIcWFRGSo6jFsz6cVNfEIk34O+8agg3bNv4ZLiEl22nbivp9+vJvhOh7J8rpgHAA==
X-Received: by 10.46.75.1 with SMTP id y1mr6355333lja.65.1484592245784;
        Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:44:05 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 21:44:03 +0300
From: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gaf: want an advice
Message-ID: <20170116184403.GC24349@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References: <20170115211156 DOT GB27077 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
 <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1701160038480 DOT 7684 AT nimbus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1701160038480.7684@nimbus>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:46:29AM +0100, Roland Lutz wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via
> geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> >the result doesn't suit me, because I need much more testing. My code
> >introduced many changes in test files so I had to manually check any one
> 
> I had the same problem while cleaning up the gnetlist code.  Even though I
> took great care to minimize the changes, normalizing the order of the pins
> on a net (which depended on gnetlist internals) introduced some which took a
> while to hand-verify.  Maybe the resulting test suite is useful for you:
> 
>   https://github.com/rlutz/xorn/tree/master/tests/netlist
> 
> There is a detailed list of changes in 'README'.  In addition to the
> original gnetlist tests, you will find a set of tests for more obscure
> gnetlist features in the subdirectory 'regression/'.
>

Thanks, Roland, I'll take a look at this.

-- 
  Vladimir