X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
         :subject:to;
        bh=pz2Z1AmPvTmYTqCQiMELvCgU6naGJ+WYs8CmcvVfoT8=;
        b=vg2oTYeLKZx0nneX7jo9v5i80YVM/L3UcT73QRSSJ7wr2xjKRY7wYqxqWl5hRMvTX+
         SscIBd9wa4XHHaRwp2BNl73YBixGIKYXExKoX1QFQuVMzHLVW5iYliR4x/4GG/cZsHy3
         ZWComJu6q9I8rd2lApLqiUCYu/2RsV34y827KPgecrFNcQ67NrYhyOPQikSXSU45CLHn
         pAeHYKNdQc+qJiiaoCuDrHWF5QIT4q2CRIH6KUD+Xye4uGnALO/T6aAlYYh4BjSe9gyp
         QlMdvjKqH38AUmwRyuKRaRDG5S4b0sYXV7Nb05LKFH/X475ZPXnL+DgiqYw6sQnVEzYa
         M1Hg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
         :date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=pz2Z1AmPvTmYTqCQiMELvCgU6naGJ+WYs8CmcvVfoT8=;
        b=f78h7vbIzjW68LZSHRaJ63wm0h1gxM5sr+W7qRQCG1g9adoFM7BH4tbRGCgSZeZ62b
         EJHHbZReO3nxm93B6KicWNdvp0Wk2CQLkJolSs8i4ZBYdl3W6PNtChTFCqUUhjcbyhKj
         sitXGN7tWLTWGj3xC+x/Yu+ZvxErvcw4OSRcx4KUI/Dn9vk6xwS3VsOHm3Cxuz336UbG
         IR+DvIa+ozF+sz7PwW03lIA9j/ImZIDqgXn6dFKFsG9NVNq4RIXIJFN3RmmTfOi0t87a
         50MI2EUCX5Mnsh1csRI+LfZv4hthx7aggojgkWdtrfILmHAHFvxSljeOmA9P+db9c1DR
         JjfQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIBOGZeAXIQmIiMrATQQ1Vh5JDEsBNM/UIXGQQKRS0vfJWzZmBbOIqMJ2mz+SVMvFQvr1l4RWW65KRHDw==
X-Received: by 10.107.20.202 with SMTP id 193mr35891794iou.152.1484575878915;
 Mon, 16 Jan 2017 06:11:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: svenn DOT bjerkem AT gmail DOT com
In-Reply-To: <20170115211156.GB27077@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20170115211156 DOT GB27077 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
From: "Svenn Are Bjerkem (svenn DOT bjerkem AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 15:11:18 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Jyrtbl_DHu9Nl22Dh-2JegZu-Yg
Message-ID: <CAGde_xMmexzFqs59oKqB9btfKCQBFgji9mMDp4-6N7HHnzTzRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gaf: want an advice
To: geda-user <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On 15 January 2017 at 22:11, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com)
[via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> Hi friends!
>
> Just to inform you: I'm still working on geda-gaf, my current work
> is here:
>
>   https://github.com/vzh/geda-gaf/tree/unstable-1.9

nice, it puts itself nicely in parallel to the official geda-gaf
checkout so I can follow both.

>
> This work is basically refactoring of gnetlist. I've delayed other
> branches to check if there is any sense to rewrite gnetlist in
> Scheme. Well, I managed to rewrite it (with some simplifications)
> in five weeks, though found the result doesn't suit me, because I
> need much more testing. My code introduced many changes in test
> files so I had to manually check any one, and still don't hope one
> pair of eyes can grasp everything. This work has spent about three
> months and is still far from being finished.

can we have real buses in gschem?

-- 
Svenn