X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=YT9oEiWcF3VHIWBU6TGjvmzr610XGJkH4szAYzunG/k=; b=hd31+nH0O3Sh56knH/OpUfc8h3Q96U2K5gWreXfbK8t8nQrba6Z3OoqyO/3qBTMmK6 RUzGisrub5nzLoxumvK3oTED6WekP+y3kLD7N6cqpJ9cjBxdVp4gO5CeOVBO9Ehtt1Ku /mFtq55it6FmIBuMoOfpu7hnpR2WSYNQQuCBJ5WeWKFEyOsQJxm+35PvhpsErShzEkhg Stwziq22Ggo6jgxubi7K+V6D2DYEW05Xc5qvhGHwy8jZBHcnBZ1mkuxbxdUJZP4pUy6a WYplCUV7x4I+BjdUseYZOJAUdvf2EintiPOaHKhYGlhO6iVCVOLEVP8eaznZ4wNfQQQN zZAw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YT9oEiWcF3VHIWBU6TGjvmzr610XGJkH4szAYzunG/k=; b=B/xV9VmIvp33QCpcx8+rke5oqDmKKDJEKobOJUIhy8bB+nCt/RYyh1DVLSFwqFEcY2 Kac0ps/1swtlVdo9bPOlcf9hOAwWAzRXGTXNNGR9vE7fmR4GwO4GZ5Aa0xbRHdDJrTWd kBs+GvI6PH3Cpj9AXR7bYMboEJ0cotIVPPHpJZfIDQvV/9QGMqG3c5M2rZR0A2H0RR8m 1EpPzPRuL3kdQUuEymEmfSH18A53IfHELFLy4492MWGGLnD7Xhu4LLYvcBdu8VRt8+a7 wVe/aH6VGFn+fx0sTzNe+I0RDUj3dqOkny3+1msMMTIlrS978PZv27dwPcUP5QnVnG8A FG9Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngveLzE4Akmb5RHjGIkVxMKD4UuCfamYy+2dQ/QAB+i4d8h1p19H1x0StE6A4IF/w1Q== X-Received: by 10.25.43.12 with SMTP id r12mr9229994lfr.104.1478665621203; Tue, 08 Nov 2016 20:27:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 07:26:48 +0300 From: "(graahnul DOT grom AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Annoying object selection behaviour in gschem > 1.6.2 Message-ID: <20161109072648.1a514005@gibi.dmn.ru> In-Reply-To: <051B056B-D858-41E3-83DD-BB9DC4097CC2@qux.com> References: <1477080832 DOT 2909 DOT 106 DOT camel AT linetec> <201610212041 DOT u9LKfw5r031245 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <1477089908 DOT 2909 DOT 123 DOT camel AT linetec> <1477129015 DOT 2909 DOT 130 DOT camel AT linetec> <141F9C23-F141-42FE-A760-834BBDAA7C2F AT qux DOT com> <86CE0804-4DB5-402E-9D6A-CAC8C69BF910 AT qux DOT com> <20161024061859 DOT 34eba7cc AT gibi DOT dmn DOT ru> <051B056B-D858-41E3-83DD-BB9DC4097CC2 AT qux DOT com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.0 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.3) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id uA94R8g6003335 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 24 Oct 2016 08:43:19 -0400 "Roger Williams (roger AT qux DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" wrote: > Hi Dmitry, Thanks for the explanation. > > It's a real pity that the change in object selection code > > 1.6.2 has this potentially dangerous side effect (i.e. > > when drag-selecting a group of objects, it is nearly > > always undesirable to partially select an object). In ≤ > > 1.6.2, NO part of an object is selected by a > > drag-select unless the selection window surrounds the > > full extent of the object. > > Can you see a way to revert to that behaviour without > going into the gschem code? > Honestly, the 5-minutes code snippet above do all what I want. Thank you for the idea.