X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <1475935657.2937.23.camel@linetec>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Segfault bug in PCB? - rather worse now...
From: "Richard Rasker (rasker AT linetec DOT nl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2016 16:07:37 +0200
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1610081552180.7286@igor2priv>
References: <1475747077 DOT 18232 DOT 10 DOT camel AT linetec>
	   <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1610061954010 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv>
	  <1475930373 DOT 2937 DOT 7 DOT camel AT linetec>
	  <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1610081511030 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv>
	 <1475933146 DOT 2937 DOT 19 DOT camel AT linetec>
	 <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1610081552180 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv>
Organization: Linetec
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu schreef op za 08-10-2016 om 15:58 [+0200]:
> 
> On Sat, 8 Oct 2016, Richard Rasker (rasker AT linetec DOT nl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:

[snip]

> > Hm, this is a bit confusing. From what you mention here, I probably use
> > the mainline version: This morning, I pulled in a PCB update from the
> > mehanik/unstable PPA, and from the build date (today's date), I assumed
> > it was your fix. But apparently, that is not necessarily the case.
> > How can I see what branch I'm using? Is 'pcb' the mainline, and
> > 'pcb-rnd' the rnd branch?
> 
> Pcb-rnd is a fork. Take it as a totally separate project. Since pcb-rnd 
> does not have branches, its name is simply pcb-rnd. I am a pcb-rnd 
> developer, all my improvements and fixes go in pcb-rnd. In majority of the 
> cases these fixes don't end up in mainline so it's very unprobable you 
> get a new segfault in mainline after I make a modification in pcb-rnd.
> 
> Anything else called "pcb" on this list is a reference to one of the 
> branches of mainline.
> 
> HTH,
> 
> Igor2

OK, thanks, this clarifies things a bit. I think I'll look into the rnd
fork and pcb branches in some more depth as soon as I have a little more
time, as I very much like to see what's going on with what is probably
my favourite piece of software :-)

Thanks again,

Best regards,

Richard Rasker