X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <1475933146.2937.19.camel@linetec>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Segfault bug in PCB? - rather worse now...
From: "Richard Rasker (rasker AT linetec DOT nl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2016 15:25:46 +0200
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1610081511030.7286@igor2priv>
References: <1475747077 DOT 18232 DOT 10 DOT camel AT linetec>
	  <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1610061954010 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv>
	 <1475930373 DOT 2937 DOT 7 DOT camel AT linetec>
	 <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1610081511030 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv>
Organization: Linetec
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu schreef op za 08-10-2016 om 15:14 [+0200]:
> 
> On Sat, 8 Oct 2016, Richard Rasker (rasker AT linetec DOT nl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> 
> > gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu schreef op do 06-10-2016 om 19:54 [+0200]:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 6 Oct 2016, Richard Rasker (rasker AT linetec DOT nl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> There appears to be a little segfault problem in PCB version 1.99z,
> >>> build Sep 13 2016 at 08:12:51, used on Linux Mint 17.3 KDE:
> >>
> >> Fixed in pcb-rnd svn HEAD.
>              ^^^^^^^
> Not sure if you mean pcb-rnd or mainline...
> 
> > Erm, not to complain too much, but PCB now(*) exhibits a much worse
> > segfault problem: the simple act of selecting (blue highlight) an
> > element will immediately crash PCB upon undoing with the U key.
> 
> If you mean rnd: I can not reproduce this in pcb-rnd - tried to select 
> elements and undo in all different ways I could think of and it worked. If 
> you can reproduce it with pcb-rnd, please ./configure with --debug and 
> send me a backtrace.
> 
> (FYI, my fix differs from any of those proposed for mainline recently.)

Hm, this is a bit confusing. From what you mention here, I probably use
the mainline version: This morning, I pulled in a PCB update from the
mehanik/unstable PPA, and from the build date (today's date), I assumed
it was your fix. But apparently, that is not necessarily the case.
How can I see what branch I'm using? Is 'pcb' the mainline, and
'pcb-rnd' the rnd branch?

Best regards,

Richard Rasker