X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=G/c/wZzfjYQ3aP0uAfBkyViRkU9qNlT1N/ioZ9whang=; b=CaRcH+wkv5gAmX0/W4IbsRHI8so60jY8/3y/5GRmazYSTS/goyom+uHdU2PLttpw1M Wjx3UhGmKj6JLcFVwM2BIAn/09z6Ax92w+pcPv5T3Y8+5x8Y3eNLECc+fzgbvFLFzcOL sYPF3CYGGxjkR4rnRwt5TPNEaR4QDy7b92IIfp3dW+iepVsYlT2HbQYv01F55ClpEFlY KMcHgPP9rhIHna+ye11gvVvbtqLOP2s047bS414MVLjrpQ5CTusuW8VqCBeOYhqwpefa 7OkTLf5ecafmg8SJ/rFlnpEZV4Dgay/PA+HVREWDhCPQp1skSgTu8uEG7lH2dnFzKj64 MsgA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=G/c/wZzfjYQ3aP0uAfBkyViRkU9qNlT1N/ioZ9whang=; b=ZVbfQaXYyyOx2n/4EI9BaLj8O9uXe4FL4hBQX7kUVfJcais0i1I4AJMXWlhtbJrZcJ mwAozRhukMkBXDs7oAB1mnDkVMuc+yuTzL00tYhTr55/9FJ4efykuJ0YSFqjMSq9mSwK uzgRdiq1dT6NdHYen0KNEWG3rSm4wJFhv/zv5QXe0Dd/MaAjejVykdRc0JoycjVaLayY GopEM7NKfNsJb+fQxuBx4ngqoGhD9FMV/rp8Nzbt6vZigmS/QlkTKCYcetOO8fiBvkeT 1O571ORN2bT9mVSy4aeOu+OnzDR2UEvSneJgvMT6rejMJJ2umrpKuYmXAuBw77liRpGN x8Cw== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouv2my1jjhZErfjvxgKa345UBnlUHwf4fXKo/mUWdoG++RcSNQjq3vMgzB78fCEqeTUC6yX4Lgja4YH/dA== X-Received: by 10.194.169.39 with SMTP id ab7mr786485wjc.0.1471503662425; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 00:01:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 23:01:01 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: [geda-user] ok to make nogui_logv() use g_log() instaed of plain vprintf()? To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com This would be the most convenient way to filter a bunch of noisy warning messages out of the unit test log, I don't see any reason not to do it? Britton