X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=tqvUwHJW1WmHs2H0G2i1O5oH/tQzoGxhQHi74c9cgNY=; b=pT2aRxJdcx0SeQ82MfTEDGvoiZFFwp9c3jpCgmKievbrvtOKf2ZEXoRG0VRl3XsuFF gj+Iw6uHy6rqjcSMpIzqrHhA3UOn1QjrSG1eeYDpV9Fz6vbBkI/fzKFAERN4qS+Emefv yxPFyII60rmNn9ScNBq2BMeZOPeeUPKNS2upoBofW35FOf6aJ0qszbuCuKDvQyizsndg 8H8xYsex5+gvk4jcQvESD2LVT6Ou3HNuEBLpo11B0IEfnruBkh0t8Omxzj87MdAuLFJ4 TPSDgm0hrGGhZmaUD4a7emrOvOhEnHGbjSmNRQb/2dTZZ2ePpB1kMZKnICg5Gm9wer13 8b5w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=tqvUwHJW1WmHs2H0G2i1O5oH/tQzoGxhQHi74c9cgNY=; b=kU0xT5I6U9Fe3HqNN8L4Me3UeKhUw5gpugLoic+GPdK9UIy+ymF+TxrjqSMQk3mDjA CO2O/dD+QfnUy0KrKWVeUat+dkj08hTvroz1/rODt/jA8IFMWMb41c6262GCH8h4CLW8 /Qy2snSzFG/FXb6bedT+Fn9knue1ipP/It6WpfF80gAhclU2m9pBliiho9WIS737SdK9 hwl5yWFrlf0E92sh5U71NOspcleoryycHnatLAdBnHo+sjYq/Aj8vgqU5s65hD0aCHap qPeTsh/HvFB/FTWRO5mRDlq6Dpd3FGPJLhuAZUqNrT94M9DH26oC202UhKtomWFYNm0b yAlg== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkooutOu4sL2wKYCMm6qmSvJDi/4FjGM0tWdFb8PC5AT192qbLXnb+WsjkQjm1HotsMtcDXrOP97jzk625E/A== X-Received: by 10.159.37.101 with SMTP id 92mr13532313uaz.109.1470528125510; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 17:02:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Chad Parker (parker DOT charles AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 20:02:04 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: [geda-user] [pcb] Element Removed When Dropping Selected Element To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c123f1c8daa88053970021e Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com --94eb2c123f1c8daa88053970021e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi All- I have a question about a behavior that I don't really understand. If this is intentional, could someone explain to me what the use case is? Here's the procedure to reproduce the behavior: 1. Open a layout with multiple elements. 2. Select one (or more) of the elements 3. Click and drag (one of) the selected element(s) over the top of a second unselected element 4. Press and hold the shift key while releasing the mouse button The unselected element is removed from the layout, and the selected element that was moved takes the name of the removed element. Note that this only happens if the element is selected before it is moved. If you just grab an element and move it, this doesn't happen. Is this intentional behavior? If so, how was this supposed to be used? Thanks, --Chad --94eb2c123f1c8daa88053970021e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi All-
I have a question about a behavior that I don't really understa= nd. If this is intentional, could someone explain to me what the use case i= s?

Here's the procedure to reproduce the behavior:

1. Open a layout with multiple elements.
2. Select one= (or more) of the elements
3. Click and drag (one of) the selected= element(s) over the top of a second unselected element
4. Press a= nd hold the shift key while releasing the mouse button

The uns= elected element is removed from the layout, and the selected element that w= as moved takes the name of the removed element.

Note tha= t this only happens if the element is selected before it is moved. If you j= ust grab an element and move it, this doesn't happen.

Is this intentional behavior? If so, how was this supposed to be used?
=
Thanks,
--Chad
--94eb2c123f1c8daa88053970021e--