X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com From: geda AT psjt DOT org (Stephan =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=B6ttcher?=) To: "John Griessen \(john\@ecosensory.com\) \[via geda-user\@delorie.com\]" Subject: Re: [geda-user] Wilkinson splitter - how to implement and use? References: <23abdc31 DOT 72365e7a DOT 572529a9 DOT 212e2 AT o2 DOT pl> <20160801162742 DOT GA27552 AT recycle DOT lbl DOT gov> <20160801184707 DOT 7b3dda2d3c0d13e103a5ec59 AT gmail DOT com> Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 21:36:39 +0200 In-Reply-To: (John Griessen's message of "Mon, 1 Aug 2016 12:21:48 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk "John Griessen (john AT ecosensory DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" writes: > There will be a need for resistive layers that can connect, yet not > trigger a short because of their attributes. Such resistive layers > would need to be inside a footprint boundary always to avoid big > trouble. Can we please work towards more orthogonality? Try not to add more differences to the layout features inside and outside footprints, please. I see that there is a problem with connectivity checks when a resistive layer connects to conductive copper. You want to flag all connections that are not part of the same footprint? -- Stephan