X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="2:YQHUDTRWKXLBNBRUMMKV:nhgwp" MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: GWP-Draft Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 15:53:23 Subject: [geda-user] =?UTF-8?Q?Wilkinson_splitter_-_how_to_implement_and_use=3F?= Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <23abdc31.72365e7a.572529a9.212e2@o2.pl> References: <23abdc31 DOT 72365e7a DOT 572529a9 DOT 212e2 AT o2 DOT pl> Conversation-Id: c-14 From: "michalwd1979 (michalwd1979 AT o2 DOT pl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: =?UTF-8?Q?geda-user=40delorie=2Ecom?= X-FactoryStamp: H--- X-Originator: 78.11.227.242 X-WP-MailID: e253c1a4dbaa880aac5fb708696e7dfd X-WP-AV: skaner antywirusowy poczty Nowej Poczty X-WP-SPAM: NO 0000010 [EaP0] Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --2:YQHUDTRWKXLBNBRUMMKV:nhgwp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Members, I need to design a RF board with some Wilkinson splitters o= n it. While the symbol of splitter is ready (rf/splitter-1.sym) and for pcb= we have even a java generator github.com (https://github.com/erichVK5/W )= , I'm not sure how to use it. The splitter is just a few fancy tracks o= n pcb (plus a resistor) that in fact are all connected. In schematics howev= er this is an element with 3 pins. In pcb I can not name the splitter pins = "1", "2", "3", because this will give warnings abou= t shorted nets. If I change schematics symbol (short its pins) there will b= e no warnings but all RF nets are reduced to one - that is not the case (al= l splitter input/output connections are lost). Is there a better/preferre= d way to deal with such RF components in gEDA? Thanks in advance, Michael= Widlok Dnia 1 maja 2016 00:06 michalwd1979 (michalwd1979 AT o2 DOT pl) = [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> napisa=C5=82(a): Hello, Long time ago I remember playing around with a patch that added t= hermals to SMD pads. There were a few issues with it, however during normal= work I figured out that in fact the most usable (maybe not only for me) th= ermals for pads are "solid" - the same as setting clearance to 0. P= roblem with just setting clearance to 0 is when You want to change clearanc= e to a part of board (by selecting objects and doing :changeclearsize(selec= ted, xx, mm/mil)) is that this breaks Yours connected pads also. Stripped = version for this patch that supports only "solid" thermals for pads= is just a few lines of code (just tested it pcb opengl version). My quest= ion: Do You think that adding it to mainline might be a good idea? If You w= ant to use it OK, if not it does not breaks anything. Best Regards, Mic= hael Widlok=0D --2:YQHUDTRWKXLBNBRUMMKV:nhgwp Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear Members,

I need to des= ign a RF board with some Wilkinson splitters on it. While the symbol of spl= itter is ready (rf/splitter-1.sym) and for pcb we have even a java generato= r (https://github.com/erichVK5/WilkinsonPowerDividerFootprintGenerator= ), I'm not sure how to use it. The splitter is just a few fancy tracks = on pcb (plus a resistor) that in fact are all connected. In schematics howe= ver this is an element with 3 pins. In pcb I can not name the splitter pins= "1", "2", "3", because this will give warnings about shorted nets. If I ch= ange schematics symbol (short its pins) there will be no warnings but all R= F nets are reduced to one - that is not the case (all splitter input/output= connections are lost).

Is there a better/pref= erred way to deal with such RF components in gEDA?
Thanks in = advance,
Michael Widlok

Dnia 1 maja 2016 00:06 michalwd1979 (michalwd1979 AT o2 DOT pl) = [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> napisa=C5=82(a):

Hello,

Long time ago I remember p= laying around with a patch that added thermals to SMD pads. There were a fe= w issues with it, however during normal work I figured out that in fact the= most usable (maybe not only for me) thermals for pads are "solid" = - the same as setting clearance to 0. Problem with just setting clearance t= o 0 is when You want to change clearance to a part of board (by selecting o= bjects and doing :changeclearsize(selected, xx, mm/mil)) is that this break= s Yours connected pads also.
Stripped version for this patch that suppo= rts only "solid" thermals for pads is just a few lines of code (jus= t tested it pcb opengl version).
My question: Do You think that adding = it to mainline might be a good idea? If You want to use it OK, if not it do= es not breaks anything.

Best Regards,
Michael Widlok

--2:YQHUDTRWKXLBNBRUMMKV:nhgwp--