X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 19:41:45 +0200 (CEST) From: Roland Lutz To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: [geda-user] Parameter substitution (was: Stay or go?) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <98D1C4E4-581D-4A03-94E4-E0330960EADF AT wellesley DOT edu> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="8323329-243607791-1469295370=:28999" Content-ID: Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323329-243607791-1469295370=:28999 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-ID: On Sat, 23 Jul 2016, Stephan Böttcher wrote: > There is a patch I submitted a long time ago to gnetlist, implementing > functionality that I depend on, but that was never looked at by anybody. > This is very discouraging, when it comes to invest time for coding. Do you mean the patch for parameter substitution[1,2]? I'd guess that, since that's quite a relevant change, the developers didn't want to just apply it without prior discussion. I had a quick glance at the patch, and it seems what you have been doing is roughly equivalent to the parameter substitution patch I submitted a while ago in the experimental netlister feature branch[3]. I just rebased that branch to the current HEAD and pushed it as "home/rlutz/experimental" to the geda-gaf repository, so you can use it right now by using that branch and setting (set! use-new-frontend #t) in your gnetlistrc file. The user-visible differences to your patch are that substitution values are defined with "subst=NAME=value" and referenced with "$(NAME)". > I am also discouraged by the requirement to use a lauchpad account, > which I don't have, and do not want to have. If it hadn't been for this requirement, I'd have reported gEDA bugs much earlier. Maybe we should change that policy? Roland [1] http://www.ieap.uni-kiel.de/et/people/stephan/rpirena/gnetlist-parameters.patch [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/geda/+bug/911440 [3] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cad.geda.user/47097/ --8323329-243607791-1469295370=:28999--