X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 08:14:04 +0200 (CEST)
X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv
To: "Atommann (atommann AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Image search mode for gedasymbols site
In-Reply-To: <CANDNR8qi2mgpXX9QU6P-_Cyzf_TQ+J3Ws1eJ0=K8uXuLW4DbOw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1606300807360.7286@igor2priv>
References: <CANDNR8oRiXYxS5b4fhqiiWDDsHgOg_cwCet3vFXFC2ovN8yOSg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1606300553100 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv> <CANDNR8rFvPzSD16E+igm07RsjTCTkUR907p6F4iJmb_Na2PKTg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1606300708030 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv>
 <CANDNR8qi2mgpXX9QU6P-_Cyzf_TQ+J3Ws1eJ0=K8uXuLW4DbOw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk



On Thu, 30 Jun 2016, Atommann (atommann AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:

> 2016-06-30 13:08 GMT+08:00  <gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu>:
>>
>> Are you going to implement that?
>
> LOL.
> If my programming level is high enough I'll implement it and then post
> this thread.
> But...
> Just speak out the vision in my brain. Sorry.

No problem. It just needs to be clear: the project is not short on ideas, 
it is short on manpower. This doesn't necessarily mean everyone 
should contribute by coding. There's a backlog in writing/maintaining 
documentation, creating content, doing systematic/focused testing.

For example I do a lot of coding on pcb-rnd; while more coding power would 
certainly be welcome, what pcb-rnd needs much more at this point is 
more testers. Plus the whole documentation needs a major revision.

Regards,

Igor2