X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 (debian 1:2.8.0~rc1-2) with nmh-1.5 X-Exmh-Isig-CompType: repl X-Exmh-Isig-Folder: inbox From: karl AT aspodata DOT se To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] pcb: ARC bug In-reply-to: References: <575325A6 DOT 5020802 AT iee DOT org> <5753CE50 DOT 1020405 AT iee DOT org> Comments: In-reply-to Kai-Martin Knaak message dated "Sun, 05 Jun 2016 17:15:47 +0200." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Message-Id: <20160605211920.51911818B856@turkos.aspodata.se> Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 23:19:20 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Kai-Martin Knaak: > M. J. Everitt wrote: > > > What I mean by the 'working area' is the canvas area described in > > PCB as the "Board size" in the preferences, not by any outline > > drawn on the screen. > > We are using "working area" in the exact same sense. I fail to see the > reasons why there is a distinction between the "working area" and the > vast rest of the technically available coordinate space. Why is it > necessary to prevent the user from accessing objects outside the > working area? Don't know, but it makes it hard to fit a board into an enclosure ... so I tend to make the "board area" bigger than the actual final pcb area so I can use footprints that "sticks out" from the board (e.g. connectors, potensiometers), fit the pcb within an "enclosure fp" etc. It's also nice to put yet-non-placed fp's outside the actual pcb area while working on the board. Regards, /Karl Hammar ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Aspö Data Lilla Aspö 148 S-742 94 Östhammar Sweden +46 173 140 57