X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=kMYTMTuQQxi5RGnBj+L42ufO+46BlHl8TvyktZskqP4=; b=pizty5Y2kF+luKAw+vmtKUrlImftc6NVXJhXaVneczDBeNru7Slbml4rUF2LOPxnqx c+rG++cJP4arT+C6ccrRF95ftXBWA9W9v+JfzgtyrU61pByFKDosgPxPEfLbemBeWga5 MQEl5JIzM/y4qCM389Re12qtt9M3lwYQNVgFYpLNXuAjCU4Uw8W7QqIzHSK0U+h3kicT NWmqp7HEoOriEuOakhU9gmPig74TXFLelSNOxquhDz4KT38flER01M0ek4BswRvmJbUG N5X+jo1VnBf2QA3itplq2VjRfyTk8wsEjt8TZLnNZ4BciO/HYSuS79kfQUJuYJr+exwW 8yBg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=kMYTMTuQQxi5RGnBj+L42ufO+46BlHl8TvyktZskqP4=; b=RGl3PtUDx38QiqSOCDIhqZeUZNzihnAbanxjuIrhEzMFUWWgUC5wlVFXPu8q6EKTDT F4dRQIXSMboa70q2TFVEbY7eWijblGN+T+ctBj85OBxrv93+AQGKrzLsZ4qitrhq0Ojd gKJb3QGyqxnqw+QUsyvMiICk2F9V9TjkzzhCGAeoIgyj64g31Zc0Od2A+81AsMbsR3xv blRX89wwogW4YccQ2YO75G8lKsrZZxg11rC1D4lACphOwGm/66lwPq8RmbwIXILZ/S7d EFUhTAopcxSO4lZi57/D44jwkm8YT4tNohVEaX1S6OWQnNiQrEZWZYanyDzqYSJDGUiS 8aPw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLzrc/FH4Hpr/8atktnxgqI1d4ARkH8Wi6pDF1CGGHExUztLFTmjWovs825s99M2w== X-Received: by 10.25.23.74 with SMTP id n71mr9561850lfi.64.1464640502451; Mon, 30 May 2016 13:35:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 23:35:00 +0300 From: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] gschem edits vanishing Message-ID: <20160530203459.GB17773@localhost.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <550D5F43 DOT 7020501 AT earthlink DOT net> <1427055675 DOT 10088 DOT 11 DOT camel AT cam DOT ac DOT uk> <20150323185439 DOT GA2429 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20150324103805 DOT GA25693 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20160528094849 DOT 2745a09e AT jive> <20160528200118 DOT GD2618 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20160530215406 DOT 57bece27 AT jive> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160530215406.57bece27@jive> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 09:54:06PM +0200, Lev (leventelist AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > Content preview: On Sat, 28 May 2016 23:01:18 +0300 "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) > [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" wrote: > Are you sure that this is my script? > My script has only about 100 > lines of code. Yours shows 890 if I understand > it correctly. [...] > > Content analysis details: (3.6 points, 5.0 required) > > pts rule name description > ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- > 0.0 FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1 No description available. > 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is > CUSTOM_MED > 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider > (leventelist[at]gmail.com) > 1.7 MIME_BASE64_TEXT RAW: Message text disguised using base64 encoding > 1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLY From and body contain different freemails > 0.9 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED ADSP custom_med hit, and not from a mailing list > X-Scan-Signature: 02cadc71b6a21453d23a5cd20d951296 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id u4UJsF6g014460 Could you please to somehow filter out the above in order to reduce signal to noise ratio on the list ;) > > On Sat, 28 May 2016 23:01:18 +0300 > "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" > wrote: > > > Are you sure that this is my script? My script has only about 100 > > lines of code. Yours shows 890 if I understand it correctly. > > Sorry, I had some html code inside it. Don't know why. It works great! > > However, I sometimes see components in the diff as if they were not found. Could you elaborate a bit more? The components might be renamed or replaced in the list of schematic components after cut-n-paste. I believe sorting of schematic contents as somebody suggested here would be convenient for people using version control systems. Say, we could use the following order: components, primitives, nets. -- Vladimir