X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=kNujRRLbtZhUSSVIDy77QYlWitjErGaMLLrW69onXHQ=; b=bXXg+0kWoakk2cLxx4QM5JpaZnD3NFPV4gFGz0XqPAnyeK6QsvjHYDtPd5Xs87oscI 6fWqT+VrqGdvSLBzwVLbadn63UVdiKAVGe1PoKY49djuBd1qiOsHLZiZ/kcIBLjjupZB WUdN/PVYnsZhElKoKA1KCLeaOi/t7jTrpUDOaEBzBTFspuHypxQa200buluIEeWPK3Hw RISZS2xmSqwtAyNBFkAF2ALQDzWx8MfG/AUqegP+vRhnaLrIlU5G9GpZ9ilQroSazwhv tN0J2goGc316L2R8RLSfHSb69fb0jO3IOxmU7MrA4/o3NxLbfLc6UJHC48m8SXHKCKqB zAqg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kNujRRLbtZhUSSVIDy77QYlWitjErGaMLLrW69onXHQ=; b=exypyRpQhmLR96PmwfTFFk0w7Si86DWjlz6MMk9amx7926vCOJo7dtNvB0YcBpnQvd PD1+8hms98DuVvX+Wp6SQvoNES7eLNY+GBYX0RPzEc/Ld3sKHM9k7J85LQui7EsguyXj xZHqsGnuiyPFnpR81flPLBbM3Rc8AhC9c/eNTWGiPVw/vqxLCzLMMpeSnVxWQeGw4Pr8 G0g+wyYpU4UJTib4yg3knDf5UvNJzhrZbx3CjMc7v8yIjB5mDDXajEhvYTrSCHwfTrSb QEmAYKnFdg9DZRy5UeQ0BQixcUqtRWZ7oPhEOZMqTTUSF3zOiQS6og8ZDVC2lR+MKlI2 quQQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWTiprgwqh3BdEo/xt/LxeIZHtyCe8M7FWqiwUMxeqFRhSMwDMDyQMxwGIdclnLUA== X-Received: by 10.28.222.8 with SMTP id v8mr5506085wmg.83.1463085533013; Thu, 12 May 2016 13:38:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 22:38:46 +0200 From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Re: gschem annoyance --> file format, same old stuff Message-Id: <20160512223846.dc47e64dd84b180307ca0c54@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5734E619.701@iee.org> References: <20160505205109 DOT 2fa7b189f4210b3c0d7a8a4b AT gmail DOT com> <57320DDA DOT 4050107 AT gmail DOT com> <20160510191203 DOT d5dccf7d7353d0a550b97a1e AT gmail DOT com> <57322CA3 DOT 3010808 AT gmail DOT com> <915F1EED-B30B-43AF-ABB0-949F0A754918 AT sbcglobal DOT net> <7BAA31F3-9E00-4372-AB4A-7739D3FD2AA0 AT noqsi DOT com> <20160512165522 DOT GA1106 AT alpha2> <20160512190533 DOT GA1161 AT alpha2> <5734E619 DOT 701 AT iee DOT org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > Whilst the human-readable files/formats have their merits, and the > ability to 'hack' the saved files around with text tools is pretty > wonderful, ... Text files also work with diff then stored in a revision control system. > I don't necessarily believe sql or a database back-end really offers any > advantages over text flat-file .. its rather using a sledgehammer to > crack a nut. You might be right with the sledge hammer, I often write embedded application there a lot of things done dynamically is done much simpler statically at or before compile time. The needed operations on the data will tell if sql is a good option.