X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=Bl++gysk9OzjGfCVKgRsNlmJpLqBWigDnj8iXMfhf8k=; b=BVyABhTI1r3mX9PqY1WqTL7GrozzLDa6JWqBz5M3qp8xtrmvamhHPtdjtrPZ004pNN pGeFNttDF942ag+0smrPX5eLj8FD6faixZPWGvNXzt5ljIzjidcTYFB2BDQzsH/X5G9p HxT0sm0DU8CAm6j4+80+KwBmQvkddwV8XtsB8CzSFVBOEGRhHch4/3HHk1sX+FE9PpqG qQMoxtsf2reHUzHEeHVfoGJAxJBW5dJrV5GEGpqMUwB50ey9g6pfS3bol6/yFwtO9Cyy KVKM2oyMeKJpZGL693wK9QgiukO4UyMIygMDaEgsdTHQtYb4kP1BB3GkcylPDxu0mSMp TSKw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=Bl++gysk9OzjGfCVKgRsNlmJpLqBWigDnj8iXMfhf8k=; b=GTdZ3WLGu/WVGoxYH5eaS9crigeAWGuIA1KLzrf+YokbcejpKpU4ehaDL8pfbb1lv0 eu/BFNaQZbKOYrnt8BAyJqpN5CVmHXifdE+FsdWaxwHVHR6Bch5AWURgMvwfkZAOxym4 8KscrWIrGKn4zVoFwODNRWWHG2BuL34QS6gDEvCljIZ9T7Ih+eGWt03Xn/Ra3Bqgbs79 scHjvfX6wPDLwGmkcSquGpJjupvubq3ypijMOoZU5GKAhNJJYhSZ5/zjlKMXyCN2wDWM sJjCbr1awyJQKbTd056ywQe2LRhUfhghJqT9MbnD39jn0uvnWnFS5RBoT1nFlrXUeUTm l1xw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWFM29udFWK64BQPaY5VnidHMTfGqqTW7q01ewYShAxpYmacPDUXZpzCBeaPwTCL+eJ+WNgZgd4LAvIpA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.204.21 with SMTP id c21mr2301685oig.188.1462985348349; Wed, 11 May 2016 09:49:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <57279961.9010802@gmail.com> References: <572622FE DOT 9050705 AT gmail DOT com> <57279961 DOT 9010802 AT gmail DOT com> Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 17:49:08 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] Re: gschem annoyances From: "Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: gEDA User Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11352400000818053293d24e Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --001a11352400000818053293d24e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 For the lazy (like me) - perhaps you could post the patch series? I'd be tempted to run a later version of gschem were the side-bar (temporarily at least) killed fire :). I should probably try to merge the multi-selection attribute editing code I'm currently running on top of a version a few years old now!, so it doesn't bit-rot. Peter On 2 May 2016 at 19:16, Iain Paton (selsinork AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > On 2016-05-01 16:38, Iain Paton wrote: > > > Finally a request for some help. While the sidebars evolve I'd like to > > temporarily go back to the old Edit Text dialog, I've found where it's > > connected in system-gschemrc with > > (,(N_ "Edit Text...") &edit-text "gtk-edit") > > but I'm having problems tracing where that &edit-text scheme function > > ends up. Would someone more familiar with how the scheme code interacts > > with the underlying C code be able to point me in the right direction? > > Actually, no need. I found and reverted > 5ae22191bdbc94a2e49af06d6017aec0ce4280ba, applied the patch from > https://bugs.launchpad.net/geda/+bug/1492834 and fixed up the conflicts. > So back to something vaguely useable for now. > > I'll be interested to see where the sidebar feature goes longer term, > but for now I think it needs more... something.. before it's useful. > > Iain > > --001a11352400000818053293d24e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
For the lazy (like me) - perhaps you could post = the patch series?

I'd be tempted to run a later version of= gschem were the side-bar (temporarily at least) killed fire :).

I should probably try to merge the multi-selection attribute editin= g code I'm currently running on top of a version a few years old now!, = so it doesn't bit-rot.


Peter

<= div class=3D"gmail_extra">
On 2 May 2016 at 1= 9:16, Iain Paton (selsinork AT gmail DOT co= m) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com<= /a>] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
On 2016-05-01 16:38, Iain Paton wrote:

> Finally a request for some help. While the sidebars evolve I'd lik= e to
> temporarily go back to the old Edit Text dialog, I've found where = it's
> connected in system-gschemrc with
> (,(N_ "Edit Text...")=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0&edit-te= xt=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0"gtk-edit")
> but I'm having problems tracing where that &edit-text scheme f= unction
> ends up. Would someone more familiar with how the scheme code interact= s
> with the underlying C code be able to point me in the right direction?=

Actually, no need. I found and reverted
5ae22191bdbc94a2e49af06d6017aec0ce4280ba, applied the patch from
https://bugs.launchpad.net/geda/+bug/1492834 and fix= ed up the conflicts.
So back to something vaguely useable for now.

I'll be interested to see where the sidebar feature goes longer term, but for now I think it needs more... something.. before it's useful.
Iain


--001a11352400000818053293d24e--