X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Envelope-From: hsank AT nospam DOT chipforge DOT org X-Envelope-To: Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 18:32:27 +0100 Message-ID: <20160228183227.Horde.g66UEijK5I0FnHyBsmI3bZU@webmail.in-berlin.de> From: Hagen SANKOWSKI To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] hierarchical design - two symbols pointing to one schematic References: <20160223152120 DOT Horde DOT _z0FeIbOqDDq7i7gKTXCeK4 AT webmail DOT in-berlin DOT de> <94CB9E71-127E-4690-9FFC-39722F79260B AT noqsi DOT com> In-Reply-To: <94CB9E71-127E-4690-9FFC-39722F79260B@noqsi.com> User-Agent: Horde Application Framework 5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Hello. Thanks for your answer. During this week I rectify my design, but still ending up - after a long, long runtime something in hours on a VirtualBox with a lot of RAM and 4 CPUs - with a gnetlist line which said: Killed. Well, I tried to do my hierarchical design a little bit smaller and run just a sup-page (which is still hierarchical) successfully thrue gnetlist. I got a bunch of lines from gnetlist for my hierarchical design like this: "Found a pin [Y300/Y2] on component [26] which does not have a label!" Well, I found the Source Code via DuckDuckGo here (sorry for the bad reference!) http://ljh4timm.home.xs4all.nl/gaf/dox_gnetlist/s__hierarchy_8c_source.html IMHO the arguments for the fprint(stderr, ..) function should be swapped. 00206 nl_current->component_uref, 00207 pl_current->pin_number); The first argument should be the pin number, the second one should be the component. This lines, I guess, are coming from hidden VDD and GND nets inside my hierachichal symbols. Nevertheless I like to feed my whole gschem-Design now into PCB now. So who is killing my gnetlist-process inside gsch2pcb? Any suggestion how to find/avoid the reason for the gnetlist-death? Regards, Hagen Sankowski -- "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin (1775)