X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 14:08:20 -0500
Message-Id: <201602251908.u1PJ8K37010188@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
CC: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:
	<CAC4O8c8_-RP_V+JVNSXvv+Vnsk0XPA+1Ab-4emtXVGS2=iP+DA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	(geda-user AT delorie DOT com)
Subject: Re: [geda-user] exactly how is moving between sides/layers supposed
 to work, and more generally...
References: <CAC4O8c_VGVSJ293PtQOj-YNan0TYnYadJHAQ8iAXN8ccg4pK9A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201602250321 DOT u1P3Lbr3003187 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c-nHp9sD50sKyP7DbcuCytZ_Lop4aCBqpRAPnaNXK=EvA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201602250338 DOT u1P3cpuB003688 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c_gKOdh26-wHsBLnGrC+akBuin8AeqaL4H+OAOh8LkiLA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201602250358 DOT u1P3wv4i004224 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c928Q-Vs4RwVKhN51ANzFxdeZV0w-Afna+UkoT8Cea5Rw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201602251705 DOT u1PH5ZXW003698 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c_2zru30MPf-=-NSV5CGKnevfoYi1=Uo-bY_wXYm98h9Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201602251858 DOT u1PIwcsi009763 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <CAC4O8c8_-RP_V+JVNSXvv+Vnsk0XPA+1Ab-4emtXVGS2=iP+DA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com


I'm saying that it's a different way of doing things, not a "faster"
or "better" way.  But different people want different things, so
please don't make some of them suffer just because you don't agree
with them.