X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Ir8vT75sj1PIKEVxcqkEfAg31bvPwzNKu/LJyhOc51A=; b=OGsy2nvkSKuYd2m+sqFrXe9dB7CsoBFzvbu1x8yXvBFGySQhR35H6cMSMHVWzOmM5W sVyWajMVNGeXfJkKkbnjA7Dpdzksm5uv+oHHF2Mxm1Q7FqT7pVnl4E8FzOMMr31URcvE 9Q0t52dhIgz4neXeWQBaIk/0nN00SZ0a3SG6TAX9XINCqRcziLSLWc6NHZo9H6y/KH5h bC/FdBHtxfydGkBWe3m0DfPkYS6/1ghHEGFJFUCSk8XoehY6PHHLU7B878y5tiC+dXtT 0Ppd8l6lZ3tI6hHe79VAjWrAAudxdVi8bem3oKsoknIq/T1tPwiMnAfaiAEMGMkRjOc2 o0hA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Ir8vT75sj1PIKEVxcqkEfAg31bvPwzNKu/LJyhOc51A=; b=gemyPpvQPMCUiCLBguvTEmhTRtQh1K84rsYYxLG68WjdW2r3qz62LQUt83/ZrZayCg /klnXiW8McEfgwfZ9IWZdQnfapaaMxJEPX540xlw2lxTAbIXP9imyfzZDNpgmedeJwz/ OcbRp95tx3W3vUSGQjXcEDgFMmazEgolS4CamOZpVabb3oehWWLPVgre3mELeakZURoZ 3TPVOVzidjVeS7DCQn80A9stIyDXOcMK7X4KmqCF/fU7kYW06aaDGD/Ac8Q0WLd5Mr/t 1U+qeQjhL53XcxVXcbXnk9nENw0UKwBOsg6qBWLnCGEspwgICMpXLH8hTTHiZsxPm7W+ alBw== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTvSsbFRwqA2eZfiEFzBYbm6aaE+TWzXJuaDzQikeWwmssGoYtq13/juscujT/7UHpN4PT/1iCuWC5jVg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.115.196 with SMTP id jq4mr8304193wjb.101.1456426599848; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 10:56:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201602251705.u1PH5ZXW003698@envy.delorie.com> References: <201602250321 DOT u1P3Lbr3003187 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201602250338 DOT u1P3cpuB003688 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201602250358 DOT u1P3wv4i004224 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201602251705 DOT u1PH5ZXW003698 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:56:39 -0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] exactly how is moving between sides/layers supposed to work, and more generally... From: "Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 8:05 AM, DJ Delorie wrote: > > I am not philosophically opposed to improving the user experience, > especially if it helps newbies learn the tools faster and easier. > > However, I'm opposed to removing functionality just because you don't > think people "need" it. Layout is something that's more of an art > than a science, and people who do a lot of layout get used to the > quirks and features that work for them. Flexibility lets them find a > method that's comfortable for them. Agree for the most part, though I'm still not seeing the saving using mark vs. subsequent click in the Import case. > Removing features because they're not "needed" is like removing orange > paint because artists can just mix red and yellow. Sure it's do-able > but it's not convenient for folks who like orange. > > Perhaps it's time for a beginner/expert switch for the menu system? > So that at first it only tells you about the "normal" ways of dealing > with things, but you can open up the rest of the features later? Well I used it ok as a noob, I just ignored most of the broken-seeming menu items and less visible hotkeys until now missing out on a lot of convenience in some places. So the troubles are they look bad at first glance (noob issue) and I suspect lots of people never figure them out (noob->expert transition issue).