X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RJ2h1By2j65moE78cVm9u74cHd8lHIeTEK2n43kVBuw=; b=Lr4ZKDtl3VY+fkH8RYqAu4MPi8qEWKc374hvZddg7h8eg+BMjlP8ciLPQmCHUSN3AT 7To14cea6+o4gm444fe5NJpwNAiZMolrmge3wAwZ3T+I7DIa/zkN/7qtLMvmH8N8Hbav 0sfCPDuuTgtpYhFbofJAEJrKtVP4SqLwsrWYr8s2suuBkqJ9c0YPBVIvSimAiNJ1u5+d wB+l1wET2wyElB5sT8GzfHPpWEi+bbopWDE0ImGSi/7qeQpjcFS2YbKUdAdXxxaq8nLc pYhJc8AuE2weLRTz3rn1q/974m7K3DEVl4X0rzzfhB8oFQm3FZiEbbz5DYcGcQaWL6Dw CZhA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RJ2h1By2j65moE78cVm9u74cHd8lHIeTEK2n43kVBuw=; b=HYkQN83yaSoJ6C4nk1U6Y2FX61ZqpdPUGybQPDEGJS0UjPqSuVHPCumhyND8tdYjv6 YK+Hkj9czWmmY0ct1GRMHfDiwM1+kZDe006+O8/USNpMVej/8rAGFDtwroFpHz+Os4KT 6ReljOqbTQUeqcIbxq4LPAxHypYDpjRs4GTF9bmgJBGNyEjR7C/otvapYqJK+2brdzj5 fpGJt299IEnjJPmnPJz2ooRsHl3egbxQSZTTkMoG1gfzoNVc6oWNqmBgUN7gh7+tmjbL tacelOidDlwLAz9/ZR1oRfwX8pgp6DjVshnxn9Hj2Y63JoWJsa921m+6tY4tKs4Tm2Of GpIg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTlykXlrPlpaA0AAwt2O4YLvmf6mGlRnUjRRjrdqxAs2ww5xO50jEY/raUCRyy7SEcq9/PUfR/L3S7W+w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.71.70 with SMTP id s6mr42582083wju.1.1456388390668; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 00:19:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <201602250321 DOT u1P3Lbr3003187 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201602250338 DOT u1P3cpuB003688 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 23:19:50 -0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] exactly how is moving between sides/layers supposed to work, and more generally... From: "Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id u1P8JttO021157 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:02 PM, Stephan Böttcher wrote: > "Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" > writes: > >> Ok. I think the overloading on B is good. > > No. Shift-X acts on selection, X acts on object under the mouse. If The overloading I was referring to on B is already there. Neither X nor Shift-X are bound to anything in the shipping arrangement so far as I can tell. What do they do for you? > you weaken that priciple the user experience will become worse, not > better. > Make the features more discoverable. But please do not try to > "optimize" them in isolation. I'm not, I'm going through and finding all the inconsistencies they have with respect to one another. I'd like them to be more consistent, not less so. Maybe take a look at my original post. Britton