X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 00:23:01 -0500
Message-Id: <201602090523.u195N1Ap025333@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:
	<CAC4O8c_hKQUAYg_4nM1uh0k62DWbRXG8WnUDqjSGnH8GGYbKzQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	(geda-user AT delorie DOT com)
Subject: Re: [geda-user] is Vendor drill mapping still relevant?
References: <CAC4O8c9pbaWEM=imUBC=QFKLd2dkMAB_ZYKCkaynYXQtC_n+yw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201602090512 DOT u195CiwF024135 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <CAC4O8c_hKQUAYg_4nM1uh0k62DWbRXG8WnUDqjSGnH8GGYbKzQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com


> So I take it there are

Most vendors used to be like this.  However, I know my home-made
boards have a limited drill set, so for home CNC it's nice to have the
drill files grouped by available sizes.

It's easy to find one example.  It's hard to prove there are none.

The Vendor file should also load DRC rules, though.