X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=rdzyMEKVjwBbLHiJPLO3+1bRLw65dTMFDzgk6W/5IGg=;
        b=lDhLpvntbJoyKqAg2JeCVFZeeRziFFtvlhOthsg7QslmjGL66OO0S1nLlfvOCv0VIG
         uqFLJCYrhHXKAf3jr1nTjeq2FFSfOdHQhAl1h0aI7VfnwrSSmFqP+lVqzfGbgR0GU68x
         jtc2MeSH4tNokga0QEIfPfGK6+Res2QHgbz+7IPgTf8679EhKmxYSrHgwbQQRCxsdsv+
         pwdDfWcbh98Z7X82bS1VlyZVxBsVN5ioHQxGKfWX4blEV55vBu4PAzOvG/dr8DQucSpZ
         lmLtTB5YV9Mb1KnjVbvV4ESmK/T4HN9ceciLOerGE+OPVIJSiBqK/NfuBWoi1Jj7uEJQ
         6zbw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=rdzyMEKVjwBbLHiJPLO3+1bRLw65dTMFDzgk6W/5IGg=;
        b=U8Qae6bYsSWoRSl9/TgOPDbVTlyfSnpySQRv3d1dJPBYzndmtu6AngX5Jp13j7pmBy
         XOowYMT2S7SO2kkO4sW+ZgIFApEFNLPK4IS6UqTH9xGI0kAJgb6JXuWxTejmBNr4qX5a
         X36bM1yOII6AKrG+HvfKCmswhm9Jm9SXTZdxgvGmUnzTTqbPSZtMu8gl8AzeoCdTGk4L
         OvKBTpoJZTqtesnUOeyzeIX9LZDKoOZHmyvXF2puS/4QWi/kk1fyoXgur1ovPTUwKi18
         0jjx28sQQ0KxDUrjjORGXd/JSnJ2ugzFhcdWL1Ocxo4m0ZzjgymW/I9Z4SuTqVkXTeqR
         uZCA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOS/k/Gd9ZKDtZEIITPkvTMQEXOUMeBfmWlpPEYIX2d4hKng0ihDTZb4uNllmT3qWP5vC9VAE9Z94Kxpvw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.19.164 with SMTP id g4mr31230952wje.120.1454995222899;
 Mon, 08 Feb 2016 21:20:22 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <201602090512.u195CiwF024135@envy.delorie.com>
References: <CAC4O8c9pbaWEM=imUBC=QFKLd2dkMAB_ZYKCkaynYXQtC_n+yw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201602090512 DOT u195CiwF024135 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 20:20:22 -0900
Message-ID: <CAC4O8c_hKQUAYg_4nM1uh0k62DWbRXG8WnUDqjSGnH8GGYbKzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] is Vendor drill mapping still relevant?
From: "Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 8:12 PM, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
>> Looks like this functionality was intended to automatically change pin
>> and via sizes to nearby standard drill diameters.
>>
>> I've never worried about setting hole sizes to please my board house
>> and they've never complained.  I wonder if this stuff is still
>> applicable nowadays?
>
> As long as there are vendors that charge for off-rack drill sizes,
> sure.

So I take it there are