X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=AAE5pTA+8Ys64plNZTlCyPLKZssMcSFSf89y1ZzElXk=; b=bx+9asVhZqrIsoFrC447G1G+jlIgYSJRS2ol9cKPLXqTYGHDLMn1b3NKHPkLkOYbvF DLP0NCfDtYxB5jOxvfShqekhWNKYZDZixsEbAVbYFA4OB3pHMS4xHaWw8KT3KZU49bib 60Lh0w/rjs1ktrp7vfj1z+hPcBS9GVLs78GBVhNVEP0RL5jVGBVTGj///0uXbzWKwPkj 4lm6UNBy1NQVOVeE5K5ja3+/35zNckIhk9IiY7Bi9Yrd3BLxpdBUn6F2XRTFQwEwrfzQ Zmi1Rq+k3h7VZiYweJOX3mA1YhVmuQvyWWyHUKfUbkU5Bf2KEoTLmg1p3uOhe7tI9uj/ FubA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=AAE5pTA+8Ys64plNZTlCyPLKZssMcSFSf89y1ZzElXk=; b=TRMXUC4j/M2se2jR02KbV4X8ufD90rW1OG8uoMNIcs2zT7KtOVRMWWrO8V3UrLwbCH mOcpbIjCdqEDNn9iVq7iDMhjLW0e1yiQ1otU51+QhOZr5SPARHlnTU2CednGToRWlS1M 1EFSDFVpOXwuKRWxvgwEgF6+Y6OePOTxDauQ2c1qP2pUuWxk89e5f/GorjJzE0vpU9b3 gCBGNtJ+ir5H0wggxf0VaaJKoilI/f2iaojuwFUbosTwknAimBWIwIpXPtft8Ghzl3P8 PSjEbqtgeSvsCPa+gw365U74y5M/buogsJc8pw6TTXfxy+QYeyjMzrdmcH8+Win081u4 2eOA== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORRHNnTobHS7rNTIZIhCUin5LNLzzA/diToPQRtZ0wq7cYNCpiFK0SGtl3FkMpOxuYG2LUm9L6+sfORxQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.125.211 with SMTP id y202mr2285157wmc.18.1454994687628; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 21:11:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 20:11:27 -0900 Message-ID: Subject: [geda-user] is Vendor drill mapping still relevant? From: "Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Looks like this functionality was intended to automatically change pin and via sizes to nearby standard drill diameters. I've never worried about setting hole sizes to please my board house and they've never complained. I wonder if this stuff is still applicable nowadays? Britton