X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <20160203145954.9029.qmail@stuge.se>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 15:59:54 +0100
From: "Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] gschem at FOSDEM
Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References: <56B20884 DOT 2040807 AT peter-b DOT co DOT uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <56B20884.2040807@peter-b.co.uk>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

Peter TB Brett (peter AT peter-b DOT co DOT uk) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> [1] https://github.com/peter-b/geda-gaf/wiki/To-Do

Thanks a lot for preparing this list, Peter! Can we place it on our
own website?

I am excited about the improvements you have in mind for gschem!

You and I discussed programming languages and I maintain my opinion,
but in the end you get to choose the how when you're doing the work.

As for naming and/or versioning, I feel that the items on your list
are a perfect fit for a gschem 2.0 release.

If other active developers wish to continue working on the 1.9 code
and want to do things differently than you then I think the first
priority would be to align the efforts, but if that is impossible
then to simply have two parallel branches; one for geda-gaf-1.9 and
one for gschem-2.0. Common changes can of course be cherry-picked.


Sorry to miss the meetup on Saturday but I'll peek in on IRC!


Kind regards

//Peter