X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=bJh1YpoYdsvTQn2fHdLBZY/LtAxMelTWxiS4HFIcJl4=; b=IjYb5djdUMGhwDsXDvnp82Kj+Jt1S9MM6XvGmlnjoJ3pXRk8mfq/ClDx5FMcZlEgHx qC5AxBgwOWqivSl30luMeOUzebFzOL7MImKYPLDqavucQI9A/e0ULyRhTw/Ft6KRKERd 9TatQb7XKziqN5kFfw71pRBgqJpFMmd1FMNkEAYKaTZcpMzQ3BnvcaHq/EqAExkLRebp 6TmIcNE/7uCOT7iGZUkyRmVrMpLuoSwGAYrLdTln3ZWEYeYTGnbQnb3WlRrbj5P5A81o 6KPwW4yIuJ40rHzJi8HpxfogfGRX2k5j43+S7cnpNjEu9/2wiV9FKsxSVbSBMK2a0cLz Wy9A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.25.40.130 with SMTP id o124mr5136540lfo.41.1444447395179; Fri, 09 Oct 2015 20:23:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20151003210701 DOT de392b925f54dadb0a5fedd8 AT gmail DOT com> <56104A0A DOT 9020507 AT xs4all DOT nl> <1443909591 DOT 1873 DOT 18 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <1443975731 DOT 671 DOT 52 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20151004191717 DOT bf8223417541a9306bfbd9ea AT gmail DOT com> <1443997480 DOT 2068 DOT 32 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <1444070851 DOT 1014 DOT 20 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <56133047 DOT 7030402 AT neurotica DOT com> <56133CC4 DOT 7000306 AT neurotica DOT com> <56137585 DOT 2030004 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201510061806 DOT t96I6tUG026305 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <56142095 DOT 8030800 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201510080301 DOT t9831weq018628 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 03:23:15 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] GTK3, Glade interface designer (router, auto?) From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: gEDA users mailing list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 3:08 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: > DJ Delorie wrote: > >> Arguing over how forky a fork is is, well, petty. Igor2 is doing >> something different with the code, fine. He's also still involved >> with us, fine. Why is this a problem? > > He presented his project as "a _proper_ fork" (underline in the > original). Why can't he have a fork, be a member of the community, and try to make his fork something people anti-fork back into the mainline. >> It's no different than every >> git branch we create being a "fork" that may or may not get merged, >> other than irrelevent mechanics and probabilities. > > Igor consistently declares to have no intentions to merge his changes > back to main line geda. Creators of feature branches typically are > motivated by the prospect to have their feature merged. To me this > represents the difference between a fork and a temporary side step. What is wrong with wanting to code in a way that might be useful to the community while not wanting to fight endlessly over what is worthy to join the mainline? > ---<)kaimartin(>--- > -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/