X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NEQG7Ldq2+EMuDFsQzX5ICL3/PCF8zQH7DYOqjfvlAg=; b=JRg3ka5DVrxa1u3wMkxjsDsk2PKfwhncfMOD2izhSmNlyKgfG7Bx4Af9c/wgpt2/s+ PxZ0dUsh1Xhe2w7Cp/S38qJzHRgXYndJXLE1NQ/ggLa2UP+ZUvh877Pq02X5u1CgwrtI HWRcGhWrzb//Yd7tx+YVSUzkVH4dctgXJTa0ciRG1EhTV06oMfQtwKQzhr318NQJcrdO 4lRIIphAvDsyQCU2XpGuwPZW5AgMt3uJoLA9nIXKEYEsMvYHRXZHlNGQljmFHjxHw9rA LVxyIEgh0NFCn05wok4/KCjrIdg8XfzWTVVcvVW0MxZJXWi8LzJ3Neptwt+GuzJAG4vl C67A== X-Received: by 10.194.60.115 with SMTP id g19mr15430954wjr.29.1444410214666; Fri, 09 Oct 2015 10:03:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 19:03:29 +0200 From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] list not user friendly? Message-Id: <20151009190329.c33c2ba271e0abdf5ac7d971@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2BF04629-93A7-4299-9FE7-F01584269B84@noqsi.com> References: <20151008122325 DOT 1913297qo8i1esw0 AT webmail DOT oregonstate DOT edu> <596B15AA-2E03-4914-A880-810DFA46D255 AT noqsi DOT com> <762773A2-9D0F-437A-AB2A-3B77A3E8099F AT noqsi DOT com> <5617E47D DOT 7080608 AT neurotica DOT com> <20151009162012 DOT 18319 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <2BF04629-93A7-4299-9FE7-F01584269B84 AT noqsi DOT com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > > Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > >> An app developer working for one of my clients thought he was a real > >> hotshot. One day in a conversation he gave me a cocky grin and > >> proudly said he won't touch a library if it hasn't seen code commits > >> in the past month or so. > >> > >> He doesn't work there anymore. > > > > I completely understand where his argument is coming from, activity > > in the project feeling more important than anything else, but I agree > > that it's not the only thing that is important, and I also agree that > > it's more important what the "absolute state" of the project is like. > > I think activity at gedasymbols.org is a far more accurate indicator of project health than developer activity. It is a sign of people using gEDA.