X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=lNeBPwueaUF7FfuNneSufECZVoSlKZCY/a3Efi0/bcI=; b=0FXRIYOHFag0iipJWAHeGdFM3fpCit7k+RxcwKxcn93UeVRKRMEggCM6VZKRWNhpO7 cGEZk+VIvAd3d2rJLGVSWNITAAgAPK6ciOBbXyUBQ7VoUh/eFSb2cO1FZEFtMIKTrwRz H/j91EBrHyqANcl9lY50AmxjhJTo9+HByA+b8p6BNjGcWndykBLw0uWTyJqIZEcDHpb/ 0aA8jAxAVfKLtHuL41ag+l3vk5e3aw2CxsDokTVOzMYlckjMmByxLtgj4Dqn5R4ZTiUQ Gv6b3ael6IbdjFROQ742e2lsLHIfE3RxNWD9r8aOSnacIzSfjJIVJ7AfXio1L8noeeS4 CIYw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.55.207.134 with SMTP id v6mr16311881qkl.53.1444409150844; Fri, 09 Oct 2015 09:45:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <626ABA01-5083-48F8-B9F0-69FA963CD2E2@noqsi.com> References: <1444070851 DOT 1014 DOT 20 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20151007135719 DOT 10977 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <20151007161001 DOT 21379 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <20151008024147 DOT 4736 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <561758AF DOT 5050503 AT m0n5t3r DOT info> <20151009150739 DOT GA16552 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20151009161112 DOT GJ17114 AT snuggle DOT org> <626ABA01-5083-48F8-B9F0-69FA963CD2E2 AT noqsi DOT com> Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 12:45:50 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] GTK3, Glade interface designer (router, auto?) From: "Marvin Dickens (mpdickens AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1145b8be58b4da0521aeb677 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --001a1145b8be58b4da0521aeb677 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I agree with John - I can not justify using beta software in a production environment. This is not to say I do not have bleeding edge binaries on a spare machine... Regards Marvin Dickens This message was sent from my Android - Please excuse my brevity. On Oct 9, 2015 12:41 PM, "John Doty" wrote: > > On Oct 9, 2015, at 10:11 AM, Don Wooton (dtwooton AT gmail DOT com) [via > geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > > > Or most debian users do not participate in popcon. > > > > And anyone who has used geda/pcb for more than a little while > > gets a current version from source. > > I disagree. When I=E2=80=99m working on sketches of new projects, I often= work > from the latest, but for things intended to go to production I=E2=80=99ll= use a > stable, distributed version. This is especially true when I=E2=80=99m col= laborating > with others: I=E2=80=99ll point them to a distributed version. They gener= ally don=E2=80=99t > want to be beta testers. > > > > > - Don > > > > On Oct 09, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu propounded certain bytes, to wit: > >> Subject: Re: [geda-user] GTK3, Glade interface designer (router, auto?= ) > >> > >> On Fri, 9 Oct 2015, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via > geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > >> > >>> On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 09:03:27AM +0300, Sabin Iacob ( > iacobs AT m0n5t3r DOT info) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > >>> ... > >>>> A good approximation might be Debian's and Ubuntu's popcon data: > >>>> > >>>> Debian: > >>>> > >>>> pcb: https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=3Dpcb > >>>> gaf: https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=3Dgeda-gaf > >>> > >>> kicad: https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=3Dkicad > >>> > >>> It is interesting that popularity of geda-gaf and kicad in Debian is > >>> nearly the same. > >> > >> Or (I was speculating) the users who chose kicad over geda also tend t= o > >> chose ubuntu over debian, so I checked: > >> > >> Ubuntu: > >> #rank name inst vote old recent no-files > 9654 > >> kicad-common 23878 75 23451 33 319 9700 kic= ad > >> 23599 75 23474 34 16 > >> > >> Maybe active ubuntu+kicad users are not installing kicad from package. > Or > >> maybe kicad users don't use debian or ubuntu. > >> -- End of excerpt from gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu' > > > > John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. > http://www.noqsi.com/ > jpd AT noqsi DOT com > > > --001a1145b8be58b4da0521aeb677 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I agree with John - I can not justify using beta software in= a production environment. This is not to say I do not have bleeding edge b= inaries on a spare machine...

Regards


Marvin Dickens

This message was sent from my Android - Please excuse my bre= vity.

On Oct 9, 2015 12:41 PM, "John Doty" &= lt;jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:

On Oct 9, 2015, at 10:11 AM, Don Wooton (dtwooton AT gmail DOT com) [via g= eda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda= -user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> Or most debian users do not participate in popcon.
>
> And anyone who has used geda/pcb for more than a little while
> gets a current version from source.

I disagree. When I=E2=80=99m working on sketches of new projects, I often w= ork from the latest, but for things intended to go to production I=E2=80=99= ll use a stable, distributed version. This is especially true when I=E2=80= =99m collaborating with others: I=E2=80=99ll point them to a distributed ve= rsion. They generally don=E2=80=99t want to be beta testers.

>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 - Don
>
> On Oct 09, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu<= /a> propounded certain bytes, to wit:
>> Subject: Re: [geda-user] GTK3, Glade interface designer (router, a= uto?)
>>
>> On Fri, 9 Oct 2015, Vladimir Zhbanov (
vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 09:03:27AM +0300, Sabin Iacob (iacobs AT m0n5t3r DOT info) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>>> ...
>>>> A good approximation might be Debian's and Ubuntu'= s popcon data:
>>>>
>>>> Debian:
>>>>
>>>> pcb: https://qa.debian.org/popcon.p= hp?package=3Dpcb
>>>> gaf: https://qa.debian.org/pop= con.php?package=3Dgeda-gaf
>>>
>>> kicad: https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php= ?package=3Dkicad
>>>
>>> It is interesting that popularity of geda-gaf and kicad in Deb= ian is
>>> nearly the same.
>>
>> Or (I was speculating) the users who chose kicad over geda also te= nd to
>> chose ubuntu over debian, so I checked:
>>
>> Ubuntu:
>> #rank name=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 inst=C2=A0 vote=C2=A0 =C2=A0old r= ecent no-files 9654
>> kicad-common=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A023878=C2=A0 =C2=A0 75 23451=C2=A0 =C2=A0 33=C2=A0 =C2=A031= 9 9700=C2=A0 kicad
>> 23599=C2=A0 =C2=A0 75 23474=C2=A0 =C2=A0 34=C2=A0 =C2=A0 16
>>
>> Maybe active ubuntu+kicad users are not installing kicad from pack= age. Or
>> maybe kicad users don't use debian or ubuntu.
>> -- End of excerpt from geda= u AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu'
>

John Doty=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Noqsi Aerospace, = Ltd.
http= ://www.noqsi.com/
jpd AT noqsi DOT com


--001a1145b8be58b4da0521aeb677--