X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=gN8OloKME41IRYMvclBe9Maezyxr3OLMVf7v7sfRGnk=;
        b=gfoMupX2u6lDH2LMJ7+J2ObVI9FvM0fU6hBhHN8dgcLoF4jjtAmOGRw3DqE6oOGdY7
         EhS7U13XSu+QjDDW8fdQjsgBDn0wgNpyPkoBrCKbmpnDxlo/mNBiNWGqrJLk0xf2Oqt5
         sUrvhBlwFbsqtj/jyghdpdpDJ2+jMS5g4su5ZxzJDJYWr+kW7WFOZGgs8rax3Qi/t4g9
         nDba7Rf7fKyo04at7QXap3brepFI9hyeh5Y1V0Hb1HGWXyWN8JESApPd1hr/yzoq0vk/
         c8rezIUIEia9OhFBjgypHJU2S7CqeQVgBnMZGYG/DlLyhxCcY3COpgTFDGGG4Z6Z2CBh
         sLxA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.134.73 with SMTP id pi9mr6953956lbb.83.1444408589104;
 Fri, 09 Oct 2015 09:36:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5617E47D.7080608@neurotica.com>
References: <20151008122325 DOT 1913297qo8i1esw0 AT webmail DOT oregonstate DOT edu>
	<596B15AA-2E03-4914-A880-810DFA46D255 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhQKJvZxyKMD3UvWrTOJGE2J+ntLt-8uMcZTA+Qkd80Cig AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<762773A2-9D0F-437A-AB2A-3B77A3E8099F AT noqsi DOT com>
	<5617E47D DOT 7080608 AT neurotica DOT com>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 12:36:29 -0400
Message-ID: <CAM2RGhR9tf2UFdGa7kHAEB2JgVBtzFbkwU-KK55Ka_DB+hPcSg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] list not user friendly?
From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: gEDA users mailing list <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com)
[via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/09/2015 07:53 AM, John Doty wrote:
>>> When you have a year old stable release and a year old unstable
>>> one new adopters think this is abandoned and ignore it.
>>
>> Not me. That suggests to me that the software is mature and ready
>> for prime time.
>
>   Bravo.  But unfortunately this is not a common attitude today.  With
> "these kids today", if it's old, it can't possibly be of any use, and
> if it's not new, it's old.
>
>   An app developer working for one of my clients thought he was a real
> hotshot.  One day in a conversation he gave me a cocky grin and
> proudly said he won't touch a library if it hasn't seen code commits
> in the past month or so.

When an unstable release features are not abandoned or folded into a
stable release after a whole year the project is flailing around.
I agree that at some point a project is finished but having stuff just
laying around unfinished is not a sign of that.

>   He doesn't work there anymore.
>
>                  -Dave
>
> - --
> Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
> New Kensington, PA
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWF+R9AAoJEE5tL7J4kgzECZoH/R/qYkEnwQB37WNrJwu8AH+a
> lq+wNNlmf2LcXmMWrdBcDqrKnIUx7rfNPuESqRcXz+VnoaZ8UR7z9lt9CegEaJSx
> slB8byFmdqgIP3ZEbDGZwamqEM4GWjZE5zeTZi88S8HsmsJG14afh3/Xh4F0Ge/l
> ZIYXn8AM7FMBP3wIPtKts7+6mbpw5fOB93az0z5bfSXcJ/NvuMAiWviJIg52jmjI
> aYuVfWnLTzZ/Iow9GfmMfSJPmhUhpg0QDPeQus7BJZpxCyy1A+XYHvMWLJb0HNIF
> Vk65kHJidI5UWw1V/O1dXkNQ2fvtFrvnit8oc85qJGwv3J67LDmRLg4X170mQJ8=
> =o6HH
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/