X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <20151009162012.18319.qmail@stuge.se>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 18:20:12 +0200
From: "Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] list not user friendly?
Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References: <20151008122325 DOT 1913297qo8i1esw0 AT webmail DOT oregonstate DOT edu> <596B15AA-2E03-4914-A880-810DFA46D255 AT noqsi DOT com> <CAM2RGhQKJvZxyKMD3UvWrTOJGE2J+ntLt-8uMcZTA+Qkd80Cig AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <762773A2-9D0F-437A-AB2A-3B77A3E8099F AT noqsi DOT com> <5617E47D DOT 7080608 AT neurotica DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5617E47D.7080608@neurotica.com>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>   An app developer working for one of my clients thought he was a real
> hotshot.  One day in a conversation he gave me a cocky grin and
> proudly said he won't touch a library if it hasn't seen code commits
> in the past month or so.
> 
>   He doesn't work there anymore.

I completely understand where his argument is coming from, activity
in the project feeling more important than anything else, but I agree
that it's not the only thing that is important, and I also agree that
it's more important what the "absolute state" of the project is like.


//Peter