X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=h1P2VAh2LrqIkWGfWUm2JDBgO8rU+V9KZrWlmy1s14I=;
        b=f6hfDEXU/WiWAggTZeFdMIpxrwkc59D/LXh3SrAX/8ZyJf1/szaVIhlAugd9J8jgBD
         DcGtML20mSJaIFTlrSNSgv6LhyekV4SPNqJSo/J3S33y2cjufy2jpgkNK0Gfd8m13RBC
         BUADt3AxVxn6kI85iBKU+ARVtes6maGZkR+GBwlV3wcv0oUlHZM5aDueai3rlI8BplVU
         dZXRkywgZJTKALAp9EAb8cbG9LncDUgD4ojv1WArhLOHCaQK7rWea3TbDgMBsggPZQV8
         bSkHkO2Z7TTtqvD0M+JMEYfijlYMnhhOd4LuPRU9bR76p4zDRoJwrTNOvGuJenq5o4Qp
         OfIw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.30.139 with SMTP id d11mr9202594qgd.85.1444319356138;
 Thu, 08 Oct 2015 08:49:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1444313402.1005.34.camel@ssalewski.de>
References: <CAC4O8c_g7e562Gaotrbi6gLfjP6cJU1ys=MtEkDE7bSh4F9dfg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<1443975731 DOT 671 DOT 52 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<20151004191717 DOT bf8223417541a9306bfbd9ea AT gmail DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c9Bi5HJfcW6wUgm_+4O2gs4vDdBMbS2hF_0dCqnBuJahQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<1443997480 DOT 2068 DOT 32 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<CAC4O8c-bnGky=Nab59-pOTJkB8Q9Tc5t5hqE+dnEF-777hUjMg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<1444070851 DOT 1014 DOT 20 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<CAM2RGhSq04NF=yLHp0v+5HDRgweOfHRZNrkqAwxwYcOyO+z38g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20151007135719 DOT 10977 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<CAM2RGhTx4=NcJY5+KyzYQnzHmWEcPy63VkSO0gZN3mQMaK1BtQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20151007161001 DOT 21379 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<mv4jmf$jfv$3 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1510080542270 DOT 7137 AT igor2priv>
	<1444313402 DOT 1005 DOT 34 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 11:49:15 -0400
Message-ID: <CANEvwqjs8d6hTyXPXjpjPfUFKeARARMMKrE5BA0Vf7trPFJQBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] GTK3, Glade interface designer (router, auto?)
From: "Marvin Dickens (mpdickens AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113a9c862a5b59052199ce4b
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

--001a113a9c862a5b59052199ce4b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I use gEDA for commercial purposes. Regarding ordinary users, the majority
of developers on this list totally ignore us. This is nothing new - It has
been the dynamic for years and personally, I do not expect this aspect to
change. The difference between me and HUNDREDS  of users over the last 10
years is I have managed to figure out how to use the tools without asking
for help. Say what you will, this list is not user friendly. Flame me for
stating the facts...

Regards


Marvin Dickens

This message was sent from my Android - Please excuse my brevity.
On Oct 8, 2015 11:30 AM, "Stefan Salewski" <mail AT ssalewski DOT de> wrote:

> On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 05:56 +0200, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:
> > > That's what we like to believe. But what if the full user base is
> > not
> > > that much larger than the subscriber list of the mailing list?
> > Partly
> > > serious. Are there any hints to realistic estimates?
> >
> > I have the same impression.
>
> I too. There may exist tools in the world with a large invisible user
> base, mostly simple perfect working tools, maybe supported by fine
> manuals or books. More complicated, advanced tools like gEDA/PCB/gnucap
> generally generate user noise, which is reflected in forum or mailing
> list traffic. I was the one that asked some months ago if gEDA is fully
> death. Obviously it is not, but I do not think that it has more active
> users than the persons posting in the last weeks. Have not count them,
> maybe twenty? And not all of them are really using the tools currently.
> I have not for last 7 years. Maybe there are indeed some invisible users
> (a poll in a german forum gave 7 gEDA users recently -- well I guess
> that are more persons that have someone tried it.)
>
> So my guess is: 10 persons using it even for commercial tasks, 10 power
> users using it more than one hour per week, and maybe 10 people using it
> at least once each year.
>
>
>

--001a113a9c862a5b59052199ce4b
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p dir=3D"ltr">I use gEDA for commercial purposes. Regarding ordinary users=
, the majority of developers on this list totally ignore us. This is nothin=
g new - It has been the dynamic for years and personally, I do not expect t=
his aspect to change. The difference between me and HUNDREDS=C2=A0 of users=
 over the last 10 years is I have managed to figure out how to use the tool=
s without asking for help. Say what you will, this list is not user friendl=
y. Flame me for stating the facts...</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">Regards<br><br><br></p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">Marvin Dickens</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">This message was sent from my Android - Please excuse my bre=
vity.</p>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Oct 8, 2015 11:30 AM, &quot;Stefan Salewski&q=
uot; &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:mail AT ssalewski DOT de">mail AT ssalewski DOT de</a>&gt; wro=
te:<br type=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"marg=
in:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Thu, 2015-10-=
08 at 05:56 +0200, <a href=3D"mailto:gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu">gedau AT igor2 DOT repo.=
hu</a> wrote:<br>
&gt; &gt; That&#39;s what we like to believe. But what if the full user bas=
e is<br>
&gt; not<br>
&gt; &gt; that much larger than the subscriber list of the mailing list?<br=
>
&gt; Partly<br>
&gt; &gt; serious. Are there any hints to realistic estimates?<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; I have the same impression.<br>
<br>
I too. There may exist tools in the world with a large invisible user<br>
base, mostly simple perfect working tools, maybe supported by fine<br>
manuals or books. More complicated, advanced tools like gEDA/PCB/gnucap<br>
generally generate user noise, which is reflected in forum or mailing<br>
list traffic. I was the one that asked some months ago if gEDA is fully<br>
death. Obviously it is not, but I do not think that it has more active<br>
users than the persons posting in the last weeks. Have not count them,<br>
maybe twenty? And not all of them are really using the tools currently.<br>
I have not for last 7 years. Maybe there are indeed some invisible users<br=
>
(a poll in a german forum gave 7 gEDA users recently -- well I guess<br>
that are more persons that have someone tried it.)<br>
<br>
So my guess is: 10 persons using it even for commercial tasks, 10 power<br>
users using it more than one hour per week, and maybe 10 people using it<br=
>
at least once each year.<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div>

--001a113a9c862a5b59052199ce4b--