X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <20151006212739.28823.qmail@stuge.se> Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 23:27:39 +0200 From: "Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] How to fix gerbv to compile with gcc5? Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <20151006115833 DOT GA6570 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es> <5613C2EC DOT 7080900 AT jump-ing DOT de> <20151006132005 DOT GA5039 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es> <5613DDD9 DOT 7090001 AT jump-ing DOT de> <56142443 DOT 5040209 AT jump-ing DOT de> <20151006195807 DOT 20938 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <5614375D DOT 1050603 AT jump-ing DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5614375D.1050603@jump-ing.de> Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > > What's the difference between fast-forward rebase and fast-forward merge > > anyway? > > The characters one types at the command line to get it done :-) Rebasing > and merging only differ in the non-fast-forward case. > > Cherry-picking is slightly different, it creates identical, but new > commits. New commits have a different hash. Just a note that rebasing onto a new base is technically cherry-picking; they're identical when the base changes. //Peter