X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=nCXZc3ocdBeO1bqUiVWGVcF7H5O+WTqTb2/zf4d2r34=; b=TxXqNWusjJjqDz3I9bIpnYtbeb/QkEq56lUSYW2K5EOD8BFDevrwQ9wft3crpeBEyv OPgmG5X3uYuueabOSnvE0Iup7eEFgr+Plvs8FU9qUCl4RZm9o1gDlKff+mBe9V4HFPaQ R+OzsZucHCzZpzIPWWX05LQP69xDQviy+ryety6tssRgIfOSyR6kmIE0aFyquWE8kqKo /gMtO9xcdVHfGGiwVJGsMcT5xoQdF+u0i+3rR+6c5mTRTmfUM3TB17hkQOHyG4GSQzVY UZAQRSsmYQ5y+yO1LErMYrFQ691ORAbeJGzQcsXXwA0NN2p/AXTwVm5mPgurlU/wrzS9 GwBw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.89.101 with SMTP id bn5mr18577546wib.20.1444162989665; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 13:23:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20151006195807.20938.qmail@stuge.se> References: <20151006115833 DOT GA6570 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es> <5613C2EC DOT 7080900 AT jump-ing DOT de> <20151006132005 DOT GA5039 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es> <5613DDD9 DOT 7090001 AT jump-ing DOT de> <56142443 DOT 5040209 AT jump-ing DOT de> <20151006195807 DOT 20938 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 12:23:09 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] How to fix gerbv to compile with gcc5? From: "Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0444eba3ff3bd305217565c0 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --f46d0444eba3ff3bd305217565c0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > > Personal wish: please try to resist to do a full merge. Cherry-picking, > > fast-forward rebasing or fast-forward merging is just fine for such > tasks. > What's the difference between fast-forward rebase and fast-forward merge anyway? --f46d0444eba3ff3bd305217565c0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via = geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote= :
Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> Personal wish: please try to resist to do a full merge. Cherry-picking= ,
> fast-forward rebasing or fast-forward merging is just fine for such ta= sks.

What's the d= ifference between fast-forward rebase and fast-forward merge anyway?
<= div style=3D"">
--f46d0444eba3ff3bd305217565c0--