X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=mail.ud03.udmedia.de; h= subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=beta; bh= l/e4zhy/o1/CD2GY16NXFFojENXrcP2WOPtuGBF3P4A=; b=k1iKxz9UXVmgbGoL LFpFtuR6XW5MDxnQbV8UAP4dBH4UK7/5Aku8+07/+mp6P2YDB0xQ2VtgJLVTyyr2 rs+3bX38mek/L7A0oXHLv8uVdl3WNhUfVK4dXisyKxDn5v+u3DsR9LVRATetw4iY aV/qTnp+a6/wHQU+szkvrPpN32E= Subject: Re: [geda-user] GTK3, Glade interface designer (router, auto?) To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <20151003210701 DOT de392b925f54dadb0a5fedd8 AT gmail DOT com> <1443903758 DOT 1873 DOT 13 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <56104A0A DOT 9020507 AT xs4all DOT nl> <1443909591 DOT 1873 DOT 18 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <1443975731 DOT 671 DOT 52 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20151004191717 DOT bf8223417541a9306bfbd9ea AT gmail DOT com> <1443997480 DOT 2068 DOT 32 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <1444070851 DOT 1014 DOT 20 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <56133047 DOT 7030402 AT neurotica DOT com> <56133CC4 DOT 7000306 AT neurotica DOT com> <56137585 DOT 2030004 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201510061806 DOT t96I6tUG026305 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> From: "Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <56142095.8030800@jump-ing.de> Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 21:27:17 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201510061806.t96I6tUG026305@envy.delorie.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Am 06.10.2015 um 20:06 schrieb DJ Delorie: > except for one thing... > > Instead of using the existing bug trackers, he created a new private[*] > bug-tracker/PPA that implies that it's the official gEDA project page, > and had all the work done in that tracker instead of the official > ones. > > [*] I say "private" because it's owned by him, and not by the geda > admin group. You see, it's exactly this nonsense why I consider it pointless to put any more work into gEDA: 1. This bug tracker isn't owned by me, it's owned by gEDAhead. A simple look at the tracker would confirm this, but apparently you didn't even look. 2. If I had seen a chance to remove my name entirely from the gEDAhead effort I certainly would have removed it, because "ownership" is something impossible in a collaborative effort. Unfortunately it's not possible to remove my name; it'll stay there just because I was the one who clicked "create". 3. Neither gEDAhead nor this bug tracker claims to be "official". gEDAhead doesn't care about "official". gEDAhead cares about making development convenient and about bringing results to the users. > He claimed it was done in the name of openness Right. There's the explanation you're missing so badly. If you prefer bugs fixed not only using a different bug tracker, but in an entire code fork, please join Igor2, Peter Clifton, Stefan Salewski, ... oh, wait, all these people don't want to join anybody. Too bad. > but neglected to > discuss it with any of the other admins, Up to the days when gEDAhead was successful, traditional admins were entirely deaf. I wrote them, they didn't anwer at all. Others wrote them, no answer either. Volunteers were clicked away without discussion. You, DJ, claimed to have no business with this team (and actually were member, but on the low privilege level). Now you try hard to find reasons to attack me personally. Not all five members of the gEDAhead team, but only me. Granted, you can attack me as much as you want. But by attacking you won't gain anything but you own or gEDA's destruction. The really shocking fact for me is that the moment you became owner of this traditional Launchpad team you fell into almost the same deafness and stubborness your precedessors showed over the years. I had really expected more from you. Very obviously you simply try to cover the more than obvious failure of the traditional team. gEDAhead was more successful in 10 days than the traditional team in the last 2 years. Times have changed. Markus -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dipl. Ing. (FH) Markus Hitter http://www.jump-ing.de/