X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <1444151797.1949.7.camel@ssalewski.de> Subject: Re: [geda-user] GTK3, Glade interface designer (router, auto?) From: Stefan Salewski To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 19:16:37 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20151003210701 DOT de392b925f54dadb0a5fedd8 AT gmail DOT com> <1443903758 DOT 1873 DOT 13 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <56104A0A DOT 9020507 AT xs4all DOT nl> <1443909591 DOT 1873 DOT 18 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <1443975731 DOT 671 DOT 52 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20151004191717 DOT bf8223417541a9306bfbd9ea AT gmail DOT com> <1443997480 DOT 2068 DOT 32 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <1444070851 DOT 1014 DOT 20 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 03:08 +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: > > And more troublesome, it was not able to play nice with tracks and > vias > > already put in place by me. > > Is this a restriction somehow implicit by the algorithm used at the > bottom > of the routing process? You can insert arbitrary numbers of vias before you start the toporouter -- it may use that vias, or do not use them, that we may tell it. But there should be NO existing traces when you start the router. I admit that is an important restriction, which people may really not like. What we may do is define keepout areas where the router put no traces, these areas can be used for manually routing. One extreme case is, that we put closely spaced vias where manually routed traces exists. We may insert these vias automatically. But that would restrict the toporouter much.